Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 26;9(1):110–119. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03930413

Table 2.

Rate difference of arteriovenous fistula events by cannulation technique

Risk Associated with BH Compared with RLa
AVF Events Univariate Analysis Adjusted Analysisb
IRR (95% CI) P Value IRR (95% CI) P Value
Systemic infections 2.71 (0.66 to 11.09) 0.17 2.52 (0.63 to 10.16) 0.19
Local infections 6.13 (0.72 to 52.0) 0.09 6.27 (0.72 to 54.95) 0.10
All AVF infections 3.85 (1.66 to 12.77) 0.03 3.75 (1.10 to 12.79) 0.04
Surgical interventions (including AVF loss) 1.08 (0.33 to 3.55) 0.90 0.87 (0.26 to 2.97) 0.82

AVF, arteriovenous fistula; BH, buttonhole; RL, rope ladder; IRR, incidence rate ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

a

Started HHD with RL and later converted to BH.

b

The analysis was adjusted for patient age and diabetes status using Poisson regression.