Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Jul 24;37(3):10.1007/s10840-013-9813-7. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9813-7

Table 2.

Patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with dabigatran versus warfarin

Mendoza
et al. [16]
Rowley
et al. [17]
Ellis
et al. [18]
Lakkireddy
et al. [19]
Kaseno
et al. [20]
Snipelisky
et al. [21]
Kim
et al. [22]
Maddox
et al. [23]
Haines
et al. [24]
Bassiouny
et al. [25]
D W D W D W D W D W D W D W D W D W D W
N 60 52 113 169 61 110 145 145 110 101 31 125 191 572 212 251 202 202 376 623
Age (year, mean) 63 64 63 60 60 59 62 61 65 61 61 62 63 60 60 59 63
Male (%) 90 88 79 79 75 79 81 74 80 74 76 67 74 69 75 73
Chronic renal insufficiency (%) 1 2
Creatinine clearance (mL/min, mean) 97 98 81 84 93 93
Serum creatinine (mg/dL, mean) 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.9
Paroxysmal AF (%) 57 57 83 55 68 46 53 48 63 57 58 52 57 55
CHADS2 score (mean overall) 1.32 1.29 1.3 1.2 0.84 1.22 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.9
0 (%) 34 40 61 46 22 20 43 29
1 (%) 43 41 31 41 27 31 37 42
>2 (%) 23 19 8 14 51 49 21 29
CHADS-Vase score (mean) 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.9
HAS-BLED score (mean) 1.47 1.63 1.2 1.1 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.1

Single values across treatment groups indicate that only the overall population value was provided. Dashes indicate unreported data

D patients treated with dabigatran, W patients treated with warfarin