Table 5.
Crude and adjusted relative odds of perceiving “getting permission to go” to be a problem in accessing healthcare
|
Women with at most primary schooling (sample N = 7,020) |
Women with no formal schooling (subsample N = 4,875) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crude |
|
Adjusted
a
|
|
Crude |
|
Adjusted
b
|
|
OR (95% CI) | p c | OR (95% CI) | p c | OR (95% CI) | p c | OR (95% CI) | p c | |
Literacy |
|
0.042 |
|
0.041 |
|
0.006 |
|
0.012 |
Illiterated |
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
Literate |
0.81 (0.66-0.99) |
|
0.77 (0.60-0.99) |
|
0.64 (0.47-0.88) |
|
0.65 (0.46-0.91) |
|
Primary schooling |
|
0.667 |
|
0.592 |
|
|
|
|
Noned |
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Incomplete |
0.90 (0.72-1.13) |
|
0.88 (0.68-1.14) |
|
|
|
|
|
Complete |
0.96 (0.72-1.26) |
|
0.97 (0.69-1.38) |
|
|
|
|
|
Women’s age (per year) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
< 35 |
0.96 (0.95-0.97) |
<0.001 |
0.95 (0.93-0.97) |
<0.001 |
0.96 (0.94-0.98) |
0.001 |
0.96 (0.94-0.98) |
<0.001 |
≥ 35 |
1.00 (0.97-1.02) |
0.828 |
1.00 (0.98-1.03) |
0.800 |
0.99 (0.97-1.02) |
0.574 |
1.00 (0.97-1.03) |
0.933 |
Household wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per quintile |
0.83 (0.76-0.90) |
<0.001 |
0.84 (0.77-0.92) |
<0.001 |
0.86 (0.78-0.95) |
0.004 |
0.87 (0.79-0.96) |
0.008 |
(lowest is ref) | ||||||||
Caste/ethnicity |
|
0.085 |
|
0.054 |
|
0.242 |
|
0.054 |
Brahmin/Chhetrid |
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
Newar or Janajati |
1.44 (1.09-1.91) |
|
1.36 (1.04-1.79) |
|
1.38 (1.00-1.91) |
|
1.40 (1.02-1.92) |
|
Dalit |
1.20 (0.91-1.58) |
|
0.92 (0.68-1.25) |
|
1.09 (0.79-1.51) |
|
0.89 (0.62-1.28) |
|
Muslim or other |
1.32 (0.85-2.04) |
|
1.07 (0.69-1.66) |
|
1.21 (0.75-1.95) |
|
1.02 (0.62-1.66) |
|
Geographic location |
|
0.818 |
|
0.113 |
|
0.732 |
|
0.325 |
Urband |
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
Rural |
1.04 (0.77-1.39) |
|
0.76 (0.54-1.07) |
|
1.06 (0.76-1.48) |
|
0.83 (0.58-1.20) |
|
Partnered status |
|
0.677 |
|
0.030 |
|
0.638 |
|
0.117 |
Not partnered |
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
Married/living with partner | 0.95 (0.75-1.21) | 1.34 (1.03-1.74) | 1.10 (0.75-1.61) | 1.35 (0.93-1.98) |
aThe constant from the multiple logistic regression was -1.707, and the p-value from the Archer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for this model was 0.278.
bThe constant from the multiple logistic regression was -1.777, and the p-value from the Archer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for this model was 0.670.
cLogistic regression p values are adjusted Wald p values.
dDenotes reference group.