Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 13;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-95

Table 5.

Crude and adjusted relative odds of perceiving “getting permission to go” to be a problem in accessing healthcare

 
Women with at most primary schooling (sample N = 7,020)
Women with no formal schooling (subsample N = 4,875)
 
Crude
 
Adjusted a
 
Crude
 
Adjusted b
 
  OR (95% CI) p c OR (95% CI) p c OR (95% CI) p c OR (95% CI) p c
Literacy
 
0.042
 
0.041
 
0.006
 
0.012
  Illiterated
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
  Literate
0.81 (0.66-0.99)
 
0.77 (0.60-0.99)
 
0.64 (0.47-0.88)
 
0.65 (0.46-0.91)
 
Primary schooling
 
0.667
 
0.592
 
 
 
 
  Noned
1.00
 
1.00
 
 
 
 
 
  Incomplete
0.90 (0.72-1.13)
 
0.88 (0.68-1.14)
 
 
 
 
 
  Complete
0.96 (0.72-1.26)
 
0.97 (0.69-1.38)
 
 
 
 
 
Women’s age (per year)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  < 35
0.96 (0.95-0.97)
<0.001
0.95 (0.93-0.97)
<0.001
0.96 (0.94-0.98)
0.001
0.96 (0.94-0.98)
<0.001
  ≥ 35
1.00 (0.97-1.02)
0.828
1.00 (0.98-1.03)
0.800
0.99 (0.97-1.02)
0.574
1.00 (0.97-1.03)
0.933
Household wealth
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Per quintile
0.83 (0.76-0.90)
<0.001
0.84 (0.77-0.92)
<0.001
0.86 (0.78-0.95)
0.004
0.87 (0.79-0.96)
0.008
  (lowest is ref)
Caste/ethnicity
 
0.085
 
0.054
 
0.242
 
0.054
  Brahmin/Chhetrid
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
  Newar or Janajati
1.44 (1.09-1.91)
 
1.36 (1.04-1.79)
 
1.38 (1.00-1.91)
 
1.40 (1.02-1.92)
 
  Dalit
1.20 (0.91-1.58)
 
0.92 (0.68-1.25)
 
1.09 (0.79-1.51)
 
0.89 (0.62-1.28)
 
  Muslim or other
1.32 (0.85-2.04)
 
1.07 (0.69-1.66)
 
1.21 (0.75-1.95)
 
1.02 (0.62-1.66)
 
Geographic location
 
0.818
 
0.113
 
0.732
 
0.325
  Urband
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
  Rural
1.04 (0.77-1.39)
 
0.76 (0.54-1.07)
 
1.06 (0.76-1.48)
 
0.83 (0.58-1.20)
 
Partnered status
 
0.677
 
0.030
 
0.638
 
0.117
  Not partnered
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
  Married/living with partner 0.95 (0.75-1.21)   1.34 (1.03-1.74)   1.10 (0.75-1.61)   1.35 (0.93-1.98)  

aThe constant from the multiple logistic regression was -1.707, and the p-value from the Archer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for this model was 0.278.

bThe constant from the multiple logistic regression was -1.777, and the p-value from the Archer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for this model was 0.670.

cLogistic regression p values are adjusted Wald p values.

dDenotes reference group.