Table 6.
Crude and adjusted relative odds of perceiving “not wanting to go alone” to be a problem in accessing healthcare
| |
Women with at most primary schooling (sample N = 7,020) |
Women with no formal schooling (subsample N = 4,875) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Crude |
|
Adjusted
a
|
|
Crude |
|
Adjusted
b
|
|
| OR (95% CI) | p c | OR (95% CI) | p c | OR (95% CI) | p c | OR (95% CI) | p c | |
|
Literacy |
|
<0.001 |
|
0.103 |
|
0.159 |
|
0.769 |
| Illiterated |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
||||
| Literate |
0.74 (0.63-0.87) |
0.85 (0.71-1.03) |
0.84 (0.66-1.07) |
0.96 (0.75-1.24) |
||||
|
Primary schooling |
|
0.005 |
|
0.048 |
|
|
|
|
| Noned |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
|
||||
| Incomplete |
0.81 (0.67-0.97) |
0.83 (0.68-1.01) |
|
|
||||
| Complete |
0.75 (0.61-0.91) |
0.77 (0.62-0.96) |
|
|
||||
|
Women’s age (per year) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| < 35 |
0.95 (0.94-0.96) |
<0.001 |
0.95 (0.94-0.96) |
<0.001 |
0.94 (0.93-0.96) |
<0.001 |
0.95 (0.93-0.97) |
<0.001 |
| ≥ 35 |
1.03 (1.01-1.04) |
<0.001 |
1.03 (1.01-1.05) |
<0.001 |
1.03 (1.01-1.05) |
0.001 |
1.04 (1.02-1.05) |
<0.001 |
|
Household wealth |
|
<0.001 |
|
<0.001 |
|
<0.001 |
|
<0.001 |
| Per quintile |
0.76 (0.71-0.81) |
0.81 (0.75-0.87) |
0.78 (0.72-0.84) |
0.81 (0.75-0.88) |
||||
| (Lowest is ref) | ||||||||
|
Caste/ethnicity |
|
0.114 |
|
0.711 |
|
0.680 |
|
0.958 |
| Brahmin/Chhetrid |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
||||
| Newar or Janajati |
1.20 (0.96-1.49) |
1.13 (0.91-1.39) |
1.02 (0.78-1.34) |
1.06 (0.82-1.37) |
||||
| Dalit |
1.36 (1.05-1.75) |
1.04 (0.81-1.34) |
1.18 (0.87-1.61) |
1.02 (0.75-1.41) |
||||
| Muslim or other |
1.19 (0.85-1.67) |
1.02 (0.74-1.40) |
1.02 (0.69-1.50) |
0.97 (0.68-1.41) |
||||
|
Geographic location |
|
<0.001 |
|
0.080 |
|
<0.001 |
|
0.022 |
| Urband |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
||||
| Rural |
1.78 (1.43-2.22) |
1.25 (0.97-1.60) |
1.89 (1.48-2.40) |
1.37 (1.05-1.79) |
||||
|
Partnered status |
|
<0.001 | |
0.226 | |
0.001 | |
0.100 |
| Not partnered |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
||||
| Married/living with partner | 0.67 (0.54-0.83) | 0.87 (0.69-1.09) | 0.65 (0.49-0.84) | 0.78 (0.58-1.05) | ||||
aThe constant from the multiple logistic regression was 0.749, and the p-value from the Archer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for this model was 0.178.
bThe constant from the multiple logistic regression was 0.760, and the p-value from the Archer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for this model was 0.917.
cLogistic regression p values are adjusted Wald p values.
dDenotes reference group.