Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 6;14:859. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-859

Table 2.

Rip coding sequences under strong diversifying positive selection on the protein level

T3E gene
Number of strains
Alignment length (nt)
Population recombination rate, N e r ( P LPT ) a
LRT statistic values for codon model pairs b
Proportions of sites in different selection regimes c
        M0 vs M3 M1a vs M2a M7 vs M8 M8a vs M8 Strict negative (ω< 0.15) Relaxed negative (0.15 <ω<0.9) Neutral (0.9<ω<1) Positive (ω>1)
RipAA
10
906
10 (0.33)
134.9
6.2
14.4
13.1
38% (ω=0.04)
56% (ω=0.48)
0%
6% (ω=2.9)
RipAJ
11
936
2 (0.54)
150.5
7.2
11.9
13.3
46% (ω=0.04)
46% (ω=0.49)
9%
7% (ω=3.1)
RipAT
9
1764
0 (0.04)
191.1
11.5
17.3
13.3
38% (ω=0.04)
48% (ω=0.54)
10%
5% (ω=3.3)
RipAW
6
1359
6 (0.00)
177.6
9.4
15.0
20.6
38% (ω=0.02)
48% (ω=0.51)
10%
5% (ω=4.9)
RipAP
7
2400
0 (0.22)
148.6
18.2
21.7
27.6
59% (ω=0.02)
29% (ω=0.48)
10%
2% (ω=10.0)
RipD
11
1971
3 (0.18)
266.5
7.2
16.7
12.7
38% (ω=0.04)
47% (ω=0.47)
9%
6% (ω=2.8)
RipG7
10
2016
10 (0.00)
561.6
28.1
37.6
43.0
46% (ω=0.04)
28% (ω=0.59)
19%
7% (ω=3.4)
RipH3
9
2229
4 (0.81)
145.7
19.5
29.5
25.1
29% (ω=0.07)
57% (ω=0.56)
10%
4% (ω=3.8)
RipS7 7 9570 0 (0.00) 329.0 30.4 34.3 42.2 48% (ω=0.03) 38% (ω=0.44) 10% 5% (ω=4.0)

aValues supporting evidence for recombination are shown in bold.

bFor the presented 9 genes all three LRTs for positive selection were significant, as well as the LRT comparing M0 vs M3 supporting strong variability of selection pressure among sites. Codon models are as described in [74].

cEstimates of selection regimes are according to model M8 if LRT comparing M8a and M8 was significant. Otherwise, selection regimes are reported according to model M8a. For strict and relaxed negative selection, the average omega value over respective selection classes is shown. Note that percentages for the four categories do not always add up to 100% due to rounding.