Table 8.
Genome-wide significant SNPs compared with the SNPs reported by Cole et al.[8]
| Chr. | Position (bp) a | Trait a | Position (bp) b | Distance (bp) | Trait b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 |
53100776 |
Dairy character |
52240216 |
860,560 |
Teat length, Rear leg side view |
| 16 |
21821449 |
Dairy character |
21741980 |
79,469 |
Somatic cell score |
| 16 |
21821449 |
Dairy character |
22179897 |
358,448 |
Rear teat placement |
| 16 |
21821449 |
Dairy character |
22272329 |
450,880 |
Somatic cell score, Rear teat placement |
| 16 |
21821449 |
Dairy character |
22406467 |
585,018 |
Somatic cell score |
| 18 |
4852600 |
Capacity |
5655435 |
802,835 |
Foot angle |
| 5 |
110149999 |
Conformation (final score) |
110886859 |
736,860 |
Fore udder attachment, Rear udder height, Udder depth |
| 5 |
110149999 |
Conformation (final score) |
110910712 |
760,713 |
Fore udder attachment, Udder depth |
| 7 |
30964539 |
Capacity |
31136178 |
171,639 |
Somatic cell score |
| 7 |
30964539 |
Capacity |
31217950 |
253,411 |
Somatic cell score |
| 7 | 30964539 | Capacity | 31655835 | 691,296 | Teat length |
aResults from our study; bresults reported by Cole et al. [8] Distance, the distance on the corresponding chromosome between the positions of the two SNPs (ours and the corresponding SNP from Cole et al.).