Table 5. Homoeolog expression changes across two developmental stages and during domestication.
Comparison | Homoeolog changes from 10 dpa to 20 dpa | Gene pairs in entire data | Gene pairs in DE genes | ||||||
wild cotton | % | dom. cotton | % | wild cotton | % | dom. cotton | % | ||
Development | No changes | 17,654 | 80.2 | 17,864 | 89.4 | 306 | 9.5 | 86 | 9.1 |
Total changed | 4,358 | 19.8 | 2,110 | 10.6 | 2,929 | 90.5 | 861 | 90.9 | |
both down-regulated | 766 | 3.5 | 246 | 1.2 | 692 | 21.4 | 142 | 15.0 | |
At down-regulated | 615 | 2.8 | 302 | 1.5 | 290 | 9.0 | 76 | 8.0 | |
Dt down-regulated | 603 | 2.7 | 283 | 1.4 | 321 | 9.9 | 79 | 8.3 | |
both up-regulated | 1,045 | 4.7 | 389 | 1.9 | 966 | 29.9 | 273 | 28.8 | |
At up-regulated | 694 | 3.2 | 478* | 2.4 | 320 | 9.9 | 150 | 15.8 | |
Dt up-regulated | 622 | 2.8 | 411 | 2.1 | 336 | 10.4 | 141 | 14.9 | |
At up, Dt down | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
At down, Dt up | 6 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
indicates that the number of genes belonging to “At up-regulated” and “Dt down-regulated” is statistically different from “Dt up-regulated” and “At down-regulated”, respectively (P<0.05).