Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2013 Jul 31;27(12):1933–1940. doi: 10.1097/qad.0b013e328360dbb4

Table 1.

Characteristicsa of the participating children at the time of pharmacokinetic evaluation.b

Children with TB No TB
Controls without tuberculosis

During TB treatment After TB treatment
N 40 32c 41d
Age (years) 7.5 (4.6–10.9) 8.5 (5.0–11.3) 8.1 (6.4–9.6)
Weight (kg) 19.6 (15.1–25.4) 23.4 (16.6–28.9) 22.2 (17.6–26.8)
BMI (kg/m2) 15.8 (15.1–17.1) 16.1 (15.3–17.6) 16.1 (15.3–16.8)
EFV dose in mg/kg of body weight 13.9 (13.1–15.0) 13.7 (12.42–15.14) 13.4 (12.5–14.2)
Time on TB treatment (months) 3.7 (2.1–5.8)
Time on ART (months) 2.6 (1.6–4.6) 7.2 (6.6–9.6) 24.1 (9.1–49.3)
Sex, male/females (% males) 17/23 (43%) 12/20 (38%) 23/18 (56%)
Genotyped (n) 33 25 31
Extensive metabolizere [n (%)] 9 (27%) 7 (28%) 8 (26%)
Intermediate metabolizere [n (%)] 15 (45%) 13 (52%) 21 (68%)
Slow metabolizere [n (%)] 9 (27%) 5 (20%) 2 (6.5)

ART, antiretroviral therapy; EFV, efavirenz; TB, tuberculosis.

a

Median (IQR) if not otherwise stated.

b

Characteristics reported are those for the first sampling occasion.

c

Eight children did not undergo repeated sampling after antituberculosis treatment: one died; ART regimen was changed in four; two were withdrawn for nonmedical reasons; one child was relocated out of the region.

d

Does not include one child with no detectable efavirenz concentrations, presumably due to poor adherence.

e

Composite CYP2B6 genotype based on 516G→T, 983T→C, and 15582C→T.