Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 19;5(12):2512–2523. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt198

Table 2.

Summary Statistics for All the WFDC Genes

Gene Subspecies L S π (10−4) θw D D* H P(HKA)
WFDC5 P. t. troglodytes 5,536 32 11.87 8.077 −0.4202 −0.3432 −1.6644 0.3858
WFDC12 P. t. troglodytes 1,323 16 3.026 4.039 −0.6318 0.4407 −0.6437 0.1866
PI3 P. t. troglodytes 3,377 25 7.748 6.310 −0.3775 0.1365 1.5448 0.9625
SEMG1 P. t. troglodytes 3,305 23 4.015 5.806 −1.172 −0.8307 −1.2782 0.7463
SEMG2 P. t. troglodytes 4,324 31 8.471 7.825 −0.8778 0.2350 −2.4092 0.9241
SLPI P. t. troglodytes 4,709 30 16.84 7.573 0.5078 0.6260 2.5195 0.9095
WFDC2 P. t. troglodytes 3,984 24 5.850 6.058 −0.7272 0.3391 −3.6322 0.4648
SPINT3 P. t. troglodytes 3,727 35 10.72 8.835 −0.8613 −0.9377 14.278 0.0604
WFDC6 P. t. troglodytes 2,807 19 1.269 4.796 −2.073** −2.290 −1.7839 0.1907
EPPIN P. t. troglodytes 3,233 23 2.356 5.806 −1.811* −2.218 5.2828 0.1362
WFDC8 P. t. troglodytes 7,179 36 9.139 9.087 −1.169 −1.054 0.5977 0.5583
WFDC9/10A P. t. troglodytes 6,863 44 16.64 11.11 −0.8419 −0.8662 2.0736 0.2643
WFDC11 P. t. troglodytes 5,037 58 37.48 14.64 −0.3621 −0.1044 9.0184 0.4493
WFDC10B/13 P. t. troglodytes 7,365 41 13.99 10.35 −0.9045 −0.8869 −5.0023 0.882
SPINT4 P. t. troglodytes 3,527 14 2.296 3.534 −0.7060 −0.1432 −1.9862 0.9805
WFDC3 P. t. troglodytes 7,572 51 20.48 12.87 −0.9501 −0.6436 −0.5163 0.4458
WFDC5 P. t. ellioti 5,536 24 9.751 5.110 0.8670 0.4099 −1.9799 0.1653
WFDC12 P. t. ellioti 1,323 7 1.277 1.491 0.8178 0.4173 −0.0063 0.9754
PI3 P. t. ellioti 3,377 14 3.947 2.981 0.9111 −0.4956 1.1021 0.3997
SEMG1 P. t. ellioti 3,305 28 3.491 5.962 −1.250 −0.5904 −0.9815 0.321
SEMG2 P. t. ellioti 4,324 22 2.378 4.685 −1.193 −0.4544 −0.1861 0.2107
SLPI P. t. ellioti 4,709 30 5.464 6.388 −0.8478 −1.875 4.6113 0.9302
WFDC2 P. t. ellioti 3,984 25 7.905 5.323 0.2832 −0.1960 5.2226 0.5012
SPINT3 P. t. ellioti 3,727 14 3.866 2.981 0.8654 0.5262 0.7953 0.2557
WFDC6 P. t. ellioti 2,807 13 1.364 2.768 −0.7455 −1.177 −1.6838 0.3477
EPPIN P. t. ellioti 3,233 23 3.936 4.898 −0.6386 −0.0079 12.0571 0.054
WFDC8 P. t. ellioti 7,179 29 5.759 6.175 −0.6888 −1.990 4.7842 0.3548
WFDC9 10A P. t. ellioti 6,863 28 10.18 5.962 0.3822 0.9311 3.1793 0.0392
WFDC11 P. t. ellioti 5,037 42 15.62 8.943 −0.1915 −0.1990 4.7848 0.2656
WFDC10B P. t. ellioti 7,365 29 6.956 6.175 −0.4046 −0.2142 0.055 0.2968
SPINT4 P. t. ellioti 3,527 14 0.8043 2.981 −1.498*** −1.007 4.3977 0.8262
WFDC3 P. t. ellioti 7,572 59 14.79 12.56 −1.182 −0.8554 15.3739 0.7554
WFDC5 P. t. verus 5,536 14 1.743 3.218 −0.8086 0.6041 9.148 0.4733
WFDC12 P. t. verus 1,323 7 1.396 1.609 0.7787 −1.027 −0.8393 0.1127
PI3 P. t. verus 3,377 7 1.979 1.609 1.6256 0.4908 0.8076 0.6147
SEMG1 P. t. verus 3,305 20 2.323 4.598 −1.2464 −0.8163 −1.4884 0.0296
SEMG2 P. t. verus 4,324 9 0.883 2.069 −0.7344 −1.207 −0.5666 0.2473
SLPI P. t. verus 4,709 14 2.797 3.218 −0.0454 1.071 0.8203 0.8173
WFDC2 P. t. verus 3,984 3 0.212 0.690 −0.4387 −0.3775 0.7653 0.3611
SPINT3 P. t. verus 3,727 9 1.865 2.069 0.5711 0.0750 3.3425 0.6688
WFDC6 P. t. verus 2,807 9 0.629 2.069 −1.1725 −0.5657 −1.0973 0.0616
EPPIN P. t. verus 3,233 7 1.523 1.609 0.9748 −0.2682 −0.4207 0.2532
WFDC8 P. t. verus 7,179 7 0.815 1.609 −0.2537 0.4908 −1.1501 0.0954
WFDC9/10A P. t. verus 6,863 22 3.333 5.057 −1.002 −0.2720 3.2896 0.4979
WFDC11 P. t. verus 5,037 25 7.986 5.747 0.0283 −0.3329 2.408 0.0605
WFDC10B/13 P. t. verus 7,365 14 3.356 3.218 0.3020 1.071 0.4249 0.4759
SPINT4 P. t. verus 3,527 6 1.062 1.379 0.6795 −0.4940 −0.4989 0.856
WFDC3 P. t. verus 7,572 32 17.27 7.356 0.6888 0.3704 12.222 0.8309

L, length sequenced (bp); S, number of segregating sites; π, nucleotide diversity per base pair (× 10−4); θw, Watterson’s estimator of Ө (4Neµ) (Watterson 1975) per base pair (× 10−4); D, Tajima’s D statistic (Tajima 1989); D*, Fu and Li’s D* test (Fu and Li 1993); H, Fay and Wu H test (Fay et al. 2002; Zeng et al. 2006); P(HKA), HKA test P value (Hudson et al. 1987).

*P value ≤0.025 using three different demographic models (constant size, our best-fit model, and Hey 2010).

**P value <0.01 using three different demographic models (constant size, our best-fit model, and Hey 2010).

***P value ≤0.025 using our best-fitting model.