Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Melanoma Res. 2008 Aug;18(4):10.1097/CMR.0b013e3283046146. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e3283046146

Table 3.

Correlations among phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK1/2) expression, clinical benefit, and changes in the receptor protein kinase expression

Correlation of change in pERK1/2
expression with
Pearson’s correlation
coefficient
P-value
Clinical response (PR) 0.06 0.87
Clinical benefit (PR + SD) −0.23 0.53
Change in C-KIT expression 0.56 0.09
Change in PDGFR-α expression −0.12 0.74
Change in PDGFR-β expression 0.40 0.25

Changes in protein expression were categorized as follows: −1, decrease; 0, no change; +1, increase. For clinical response, partial response (PR) was coded as 1 and others as 0. For clinical benefit, PR or stable disease (SD) was coded as 1 and others as 0.