Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Apr;198(4):10.2214/AJR.11.7280. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7280

TABLE I.

Comparison of Study Subgroups With and Without Unexpected Findings on Preoperative PET/CT

Characteristic Total
(n = 32)
Patients With No
Unexpected Findings
(n=28)
Patients With
Unexpected Findings
(n = 4)

Age (y), median (range) 61 (39–82) 62 (39–82) 56.7 (45–70)
Sex, no. of patients
  Male 23 19 4
  Female 9 9 0
Stage of melanoma, no. of patients
  IIIC 24 21 3
  IV 8 7 1
Primary melanoma Breslow thickness (mm), median (range)a 2.7(0.2–19) 1.7(0.2–5.9) 8.8(1.8–19)
Primary melanoma Clark level, no. of patientsa
  4 8 6 2
  3 11 10 1
  2 2 3 0
Primary melanoma mitotic figures/mm2, median (range)a 7(1–24) 7(1–24) 5(1–12)
Primary melanoma vascular invasion present, no. of patients/totala 3/20 2/17 1/3
Size of metastasis amended for resection (mm), median (range) 24 (0–90) 23 (0–90) 34 (13–53)
Time between the primary melanoma and enrollment in our study (months), median (range) 38 (1–176) 40 (1–176) 31 (3–68)
Biochemotherapy before study enrollment, no. of patients/total 6/32 4/28 2/4
Time between PET/CT and CECT (months), median (range) 12 (1–36) 12 (1–36) 15 (2–30)
a

Not all characteristics of primary melanoma were available for all 32 study patients because of unknown primary, mucosal melanoma, or incomplete records of cutaneous primary melanoma excisional biopsy. Median value was calculated according to the available incomplete data.