Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 2;16(2):155–165. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt126

Table 4.

Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) Predicting Disparity Class (Low, Moderate, and High) Membership for a Quartile Increase in the Proportion Hispanics, Blacks, and Families Living in Poverty Within a Census Tract, Stratified by Rural/Urban Status

Predictor Rural census tracts Urban census tracts
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Low versus high Low versus high
Hispanic 0.91 0.87, 0.95 0.68 0.67, 0.70
Black 0.95 0.90, 0.99a 0.91 0.89, 0.93
Poverty 0.78 0.74, 0.82 0.68 0.67, 0.70
Moderate versus high Moderate versus high
Hispanic 0.82 0.78, 0.85 1.05 1.02, 1.08
Black 1.02 0.97, 1.06 1.08 1.05, 1.11
Poverty 0.83 0.79, 0.87 1.03 1.01, 1.06
Low versus moderate Low versus moderate
Hispanic 1.12 1.08, 1.15 0.65 0.63, 0.67
Black 0.93 0.90, 0.96 0.84 0.82, 0.87
Poverty 0.93 0.90, 0.96 0.66 0.64, 0.68

Note. aDue to the overall large number of comparisons (n = 6), we did a Bonferonni correction to maintain an overall α of .05. Thus, to be considered significant, each p value must be ≤.01. For the effect of a quartile increase in the proportion of Blacks on low versus high disparity, p =.02; thus, we did not consider this effect significant despite the 95% CI not including 1.00.