Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 2;16(2):186–196. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt130

Table 1.

Demographics of Participants in San Diego, Tijuana, and Guadalajara (N = 1,901), and Associations Between Cities’ Proximity to San Diego and Demographic and Mediator Variables

All cities San Diego Tijuana Guadalajara p value Ranked city distance from San Diegoa
(N = 1,901) (N = 1,103) (N = 398) (N = 400) Rho p value
City 1 City 2 City 3
Demographic variables
 Complete home smoking bans −.47 <.001
 Ageb 39.8 (15.7) 41.02,3 (15.6) 38.41 (15.0) 38.11 (16.4)    .001 −.06    .027
 Gender (% male) 48.1% 47.9% 46.9% 49.9%    .683   .00    .909
 Employed 53.9% 53.8% 56.5% 51.5%     .374a   .02    .402
 Educationb 5.0 (1.9) 5.22 (1.9) 4.21,3 (1.8) 5.12 (2.0) <.001 −.12 <.001
Marital status (% married or cohabiting) 60.1% 62.8%3 61.4%3 51.6%1,2 <.001   .07    .007
Mediator variables
 Nonsmoker 65.1% 68.4%2,3 59.9%1 61.2%1 <.002 −.08    .001
 Former smoker 18.4% 21.2%3 16.4% 12.8%1 <.002 −.08    .003
 Other smoker in home 25.8% 18.6%2,3 33.1%1 38.3%1 <.001   .17 <.001
 Children 67.5% 67.5% 69.1% 66.0% NS   .03    .290
 Acculturation to United States 1.8 2.32,3 1.41 1.31  .00 −.58 <.001
 SHSe aversion 2.8 (.3) 2.9 (.3)2,3 2.8 (.3)1,3 2.7 (.4)1,2 <.001 −.23 <.001
 Antismoking pressure 16.3 (5.9) 18.0 (5.6)2,3 16.1 (5.2)1,3 12.3 (5.1)1,2 <.001 −.37 <.001
 Work bans 33.2% 40.7%2,3 28.6%1,3 17.8%1,2 <.001 −.21 <.001

Notes. NS = nonsignificant; SHSe = secondhand smoke exposure.

aStatistics are Spearman rho associations between cities ranked (San Diego = 1, Tijuana = 2, Guadalajara = 3) on proximity to California and selected predictors.

bNumbers in cells are means, standard deviations or percentages, and associated probabilities. Superscripted numbers refer to differences between cities corrected by Scheffe procedures for multiple testing with α = .05. Contrasts not referenced were not statistically significant, p > .05.