Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun;38(3):242–247. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3182937921

Table 2.

Univariate Cox regression analysis of variables influencing overall survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer

Adjusted
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence
Interval
P value

Year group
 Before 10/2006 1.00 (Reference)
 After 10/2006 0.50 (0.34-0.94) 0.03

Molecular receptor expression type
 Basal 1.00
 Luminal A 0.23 (0.12-0.41) <0.001
 Luminal B 0.37 (0.17-0.79) 0.01
 HER2 0.49 (0.29-0.83) 0.008

% nodes positive
 ≥ 20% 1.0
 < 20% 0.42 (0.25-0.70) 0.001

Radiation dose (continuous) 0.94 (0.90-0.98) 0.003

Radiation treatment
 Yes 1.00
 No 5.01 (2.69-9.35) <0.001

Estrogen receptor+
 Yes 1.00
 No 2.74 (1.64-4.57) <0.001

Hormone therapy for estrogen
receptor+ disease
1.00
 Yes 4.61 (2.54-8.37) <0.001
 No

Lymphovascular invasion
 Yes 1.00
 No 0.56 (0.34-0.92) 0.02

Grade
 Grade 3 1.00
 Grade 1 or 2 0.29 (0.14-0.61) 0.001

Pathologic complete response
 Yes 1.00
 No 3.55 (1.55-8.15) 0.003

Extracapsular extension
 Yes 1.00
 No 0.57 (0.34-0.94) 0.03

PET/CT used in initial staging
 Yes 1.00
 No 0.69 (0.39-1.21) 0.20

Race
 African-American 1.00
 Other 1.18 (0.72-1.94) 0.51

Taxane received
 Yes 1.00
 No 3.47 (0.85-14.24) 0.08

HER2
 Yes 1.00
 No 1.12 (0.072-1.75) 0.61

Neoadjuvant trastuzumab in HER2 +
 Yes 1.00
 No 2.16 (0.66-7.06) 0.20

Abbreviations: PET/CT, positron emission tomography - computed tomography Other factors that were not significant in the univariate analysis were race, age, menopause status, HER2 status, fraction schedule, and surgical margin