Table 2.
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
d(P=N) | 1.650 | 1.616 | 1.659 | 1.623 | 1.654 | 1.618 |
d(M-Cl) | 2.256 | 2.285 | 2.258 | 2.283 | 2.258 | 2.283 |
ΔrG [kJmol−1] | −1797b | −701b | −1824 | −711 | −1811 | −708 |
GAP [eV] | 3.34 | 4.55 | 2.91 | 4.35 | 4.08 | 4.58 |
ν(P=N) [cm−1]a | 948b (940) | 953b (923) | 948 (940) | 957 (929) | 942 (930) | 951 (930) |
ν(M-Cl) [cm−1]a | 374;385 (382 br) | 345;357 (331;349) | 370;384 (384 br) | 344;357 (331;347) | 371;384 (359 br) | 343;358 (331;351) |
IR spectra were simulated in aqueous solvent; (experimental values obtained from nujol mulls between polyethylene sheets).
For the doubly substituted complexes, the reaction energies were scaled per metal atom.