Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Oct 18;35(4):10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.10.081. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.10.081

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Path length (L; left), clustering coefficient (C; middle left), small-worldness (S; middle right) and modularity (Q; right) for CDR 0 (blue), CDR 0.5 (green) and CDR 1 (red) groups as a function of K. The false discovery rate (FDR) corrected p-values (lower frames) for these effects are shown for the one-way ANOVA (black crosses), and for each of the contrasts [CDR 0 vs. CDR 0.5 (cyan), CDR 0.5 vs. CDR 1 (magenta), and CDR 0 vs. CDR 1 (purple)]. We investigated only the individual contrasts where the ANOVA showed a significant CDR effect. The black line indicates FDR corrected p = 0.05. The figure shows that there was a significant effect of CDR on C, S, and Q over certain ranges of K.