Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2011 Aug 4;30(24):10.1002/sim.4322. doi: 10.1002/sim.4322

Table 4.

“Finding A” performance: variations of base-case (θ = 0.90, true A = {X1 > 0, X2 < 0}) and null-case (θ = 0 true A null) for VT(R)0.05.

Sensitivity Specificity AUC PPV NPV Proportion  null Median |Â| {X1, X2}∈ tree # Unique X’s
θ = 0.9:
 Base Case 0.47 0.89 0.77 0.55 0.84 0.07 189 0.51 3.62
p = 30 0.48 0.89 0.78 0.51 0.85 0.15 213 0.52 2.89
 Correlated 0.52 0.85 0.76 0.52 0.85 0.03 247 0.32 4.08
 Sub-spec (ai) 0.54 0.89 0.79 0.60 0.86 0.04 218 0.62 3.59
 Sub-spec (ai, bi) 0.50 0.89 0.76 0.57 0.85 0.05 216 0.48 3.61
n = 400 0.40 0.82 0.66 0.42 0.81 0.05 93 0.19 4.09
n = 2000 0.68 0.93 0.87 0.74 0.90 0.03 462 0.78 3.03
 Larger |A| 0.41 0.91 0.78 0.77 0.61 0.06 233 0.54 3.35
θ = 1.5 0.78 0.91 0.89 0.77 0.93 0.00 245 0.83 3.39
θ = 0:
 Base Case - 0.87 - - - 0.25 131 - 3.29
p = 30 - 0.88 - - - 0.27 103 - 2.90
 Correlated - 0.82 - - - 0.09 164 - 4.19
 Sub-spec (ai) - 0.84 - - - 0.17 152 - 3.44
 Sub-spec (ai, bi) - 0.86 - - - 0.28 131 - 3.25
n = 400 - 0.78 - - - 0.05 86 - 4.10
n = 2000 - 0.88 - - - 0.25 230 - 2.84