Table 1.
Description of our search for the infant’s PCP | Number of calls per infant* | ||
---|---|---|---|
Median | SD | ||
Rapid success = 91 | |||
85 infants | The listed provider knew that he or she was the infant’s PCP | 1 | .3 |
6 infants | The listed provider was the PCP or a partner, but a nurse or other staff person had been delegated to inform the parent about the result. | 1 | .4 |
Eventual success = 45 | |||
18 infants | The listed provider was not the PCP but knew the correct PCP | 2 | 1.4 |
5 infants | We identified the PCP after a call to the birthing facility’s nursery or medical records department | 3 | .9 |
2 infants | We identified the PCP after a second NBS report was sent to us with a different PCP | 4 | 0 |
15 infants | The listed provider initially denied knowing the infant, but we learned later that the parent subsequently called the PCP’s office for an appointment | 3 | .5 |
5 infants | The listed provider initially claimed to be the PCP, but we later discovered that the infant had been moved to another PCP’s practice | 3 | 1.5 |
Failure = 14 | |||
5 infants | PCP search ended when an exclusion criterion was identified** | 2 | 1.3 |
9 infants | PCP was not found using protocol criteria*** | 4 | .8 |
Number of calls does not include faxes and calls needed to verify fax numbers or other contact information
Exclusion criteria were if the infant was less than 35 weeks gestation age, spent more than 5 days in the NICU, or had a parent that spoke a language other than English.
The IRB protocol specifically prohibited us from contacting the parents directly to ask who their infant’s physician is. We could only seek this information from clinic, hospital or insurance records.