Table 2.
Overall trial | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of cases (annualized %) | HR (95% CI)a | Pb | ||
Intervention (N=19,541) | Comparison (N=29,294) | |||
NMSC | 1923 (1.28) | 2984 (1.32) | 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) | 0.44 |
Melanoma | 114 (0.07) | 165 (0.07) | 1.04 (0.82, 1.32) | 0.78 |
Sensitivity analysisc | ||||
Number of cases (Annualized %) | HR (95% CI)a | Pb | ||
Intervention | Comparison | |||
NMSC | 977 (1.27) | 2470 (1.34) | 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) | 0.76 |
Melanoma | 54 (0.07) | 136 (0.07) | 1.04 (0.75, 1.43) | 0.83 |
All models were adjusted for age, assignment in the Hormone Therapy trial, and assignment in the Calcium/Vitamin D trial.
Two-sided (from Cox proportional hazards model).
Sensitivity analysis censored women who did not comply with trial requirements (e.g., intervention participants who missed an annual clinic visit, failed to participate in ≥9 of the 18 first year group sessions, or failed to participate in ≥2 of the 4 group sessions in subsequent years; or comparison participants who missed an annual clinic visit)