Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan 17;107(7):10.1002/jso.23316. doi: 10.1002/jso.23316

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Expression of MUC1 on PC CSCs in vivo. Male nude mice were injected with HPAF-II cells into the right flank. After 25 days, mice were sacrificed and tumor sections were digested to a single cell suspension. Lineage cells were assessed for CSC and MUC1 levels via flow cytometry. A: A representative image of CD133 stain from the HPAF-II tumors is displayed with the isotype control. B: To assess Triple+ CSCs, CD24+CD44+ cells were first gated and then EpCAM expression on those cells was determined. Representative staining and isotype controls are displayed. C: Gated CD133+ and Triple+ CSCs were assessed for their MUC1 expression via TAB 004 staining. A representative sample is shown for each. D: A HPAF-II tumor section was assessed for TAB 004 and CD133 expression using immunoflourescence. TAB 004 staining was seen throughout the tumor and localized areas of CD133 were observed. Co-localization of TAB 004 and CD133 was observed (white arrows). For all experiments (n = 4 mice) and the experiment was repeated twice.