Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 16;11:41. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-11-41

Table 2.

Effects of ZnPcS 4 -AN-based PDT and/or Dox treatments on erythrogram parameters of healthy and Ehrlich solid tumor-bearing mice

Group Treatment RBC (x 10 6 /μL) HGB (g/dL) HCT (%) MCV (fL) MCH (pg) MCHC (g/dL) RDW (%)
1
NC
8.8 ± 0.1
12.8 ± 0.1
31.5 ± 0.3
35.8 ± 0.1
14.5 ± 0.1
40.5 ± 0.2
13.01 ± 0.09
2
CT
8.6 ± 0.2
12.0 ± 0.2
30.7 ± 0.5
35.7 ± 0.3
13.9 ± 0.1** a
38.9 ± 0.2** a
13.6 ± 0.3
3
ZnPc
6.6 ± 0.7** a. * b
9.2 ± 0.9** a. * b
23.3 ± 2.5** a. * b
35.6 ± 0.4
14.2 ± 0.3
39.9 ± 0.5
14.1 ± 0.7
4
LS
8.5 ± 0.1* a.c
11.9 ± 0.2** c
30.5 ± 0.5* a. ** c
36.0 ± 0.1
14.08 ± 0.08** a
39.1 ± 0.2** a
13.1 ± 0.2
5
PDT
8.1 ± 0.2** a. * b.d
11.4 ± 0.3** c
29.0 ± 0.6** a. * b
35.7 ± 0.2
14.0 ± 0.1
39.2 ± 0.2
14.0 ± 0.3
6
Dox
7.8 ± 0.3
11.1 ± 0.3
30 ± 1
38 ± 2
14.1 ± 0.3
38 ± 1** a
13.5 ± 0.4
7
ZnPc/Dox
8.0 ± 0.4* a
10.9 ± 0.5
28 ± 1** a
35.25 ± 0.05
13.60 ± 0.00* a.d
38.50 ± 0.00* a.c.d
13.8 ± 0.4
8
Dox/LS
7.6 ± 0.4** a. * b.d
10.9 ± 0.5* a
27 ± 1* a.d. ** b
35.8 ± 0.7
14.3 ± 0.1* b
39.9 ± 0.5
13.5 ± 0.6
9
Dox/PDT
8.3 ± 0.2 . * c.h
11.8 ± 0.2** c
30.1 ± 0.6* a. ** c
36.2 ± 0.3
14.18 ± 0.12* g
39.2 ± 0.1** a. * g
14.2 ± 0.3
  P-values 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.195 0.018 0.000 0.033

Data were expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error of mean). RBC = Red Blood Cells; HGB = Hemoglobin; HCT = Hematocrit; MCV = Mean Corpuscular Volume; MCH = Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin; MCHC = Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration; RDW = Red cell Distribution Width (represents an indication of the amount of variation - anisocytosis - in cell size); g/dL = grams per deciliter; fL = fentoliters; pg = picograms. P-values of HGB, MCV and RDW were generated by ANOVA, while other p-values were generated by Kruskal-Wallis test. Lower-case letters indicate significant diferences in 2-by-2 comparisons detected by Bonferroni (HGB, MCV and RDW) or Mann–Whitney (other variables) tests, with a = significant compared to group 1; b = significant compared to group 2; c = significant compared to group 3; d = significant compared to group 4; e = significant compared to group 5; f = significant compared to group 6; g = significant compared to group 7; h = significant compared to group 8. Asterisks indicate significant differences (*p < 0.05) or highly significant (**p < 0.01). For details of experimental groups see Table 5.