Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):10.1162/jocn.2009.21298. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21298

Table 1.

Recognition memory performance.

Recognition judgment
Word type Remember Know New
Proportion of responses
Old
 Visual modality 0.62 (0.17) 0.26 (0.17) 0.13 (0.07)
 Auditory modality 0.62 (0.16) 0.25 (0.17) 0.12 (0.07)
New
 Visual modality 0.04 (0.05) 0.11 (0.07) 0.85 (0.10)
 Auditory modality 0.05 (0.04) 0.12 (0.08) 0.83 (0.11)
Mean response time (ms)
Old
 Visual modality 1197 (179) 1711 (450) 1461 (275)
 Auditory modality 1421 (176) 1955 (425) 1775 (323)
New
 Visual modality 1551* (704) 1824* (448) 1289 (205)
 Auditory modality 1670* (528) 2040* (448) 1562 (201)

Note. Values are across-subject means (s.d.). n = 24.

*

Some volunteers did not make any remember or know judgments to new words. The response times shown here are based on 15, 20, and 23 volunteers for remember judgments on new visual words, remember judgments on new auditory words, and know judgments on new words respectively.