Table 1.
Responders (n=40) | Non-Responders (n=22) | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (range 17.4–85.5 yr) | Mean (SD) | 53.1 (15.0) | 63.3 (12.7) | 0.008 |
Treatment regimes | Anthra-HDAC | 33 (53.2%) | 15 (24.2%) | 0.0001 |
Flu-HDAC | 7 (11.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
HDAC-plus non Anthra | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (11.3%) | ||
Gender | Male | 16 (25.8%) | 10 (16.1%) | 0.68 |
Female | 24 (38.7%) | 12 (19.4%) | ||
FAB (French-American- British classification) | M0 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (3.3%) | 0.36 |
M1 | 7 (11.5%) | 2 (3.3%) | ||
M2 | 9 (14.8%) | 9 (14.8%) | ||
M4 | 10 (16.4%) | 6 (9.8%) | ||
M5 | 11 (18.0%) | 2 (3.3%) | ||
M7 | 1 (1.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
RAEBT | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.6%) | ||
Cyto-genetics | Favorable | 4 (6.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.003 |
Intermediate | 26 (41.9%) | 8 (12.9%) | ||
Unfavorable | 9 (14.5%) | 14 (22.6%) | ||
NA | 1 (1.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
Performance Status | 0 | 4 (6.4%) | 7 (11.3%) | 0.18 |
1 | 22 (35.5%) | 12 (19.4%) | ||
2+ | 14 (22.6%) | 3 (4.8%) | ||
NPM1 | Mutation | 6 (9.7%) | 4 (6.5%) | 0.47 |
Wild type | 11 (17.7%) | 14 (22.6%) | ||
NA | 23 (37.1%) | 4 (6.5%) | ||
FLT3 ITD | Positive | 11 (17.7%) | 6 (9.7%) | 0.92 |
Negative | 24 (38.7%) | 14 (22.6%) | ||
NA | 5 (8.1%) | 2 (3.2%) | ||
FLT3 D835 | Positive | 3 (4.8%) | 1 (1.6%) | 0.89 |
Negative | 33 (53.2%) | 19 (30.7%) | ||
NA | 4 (6.5%) | 2 (3.2%) | ||
Ras mutation | Positive | 4 (6.5%) | 4 (6.5%) | 0.47 |
Negative | 19 (30.6%) | 12 (19.3%) | ||
NA | 17 (27.4%) | 6 (9.7%) |
Comparisons between responders and non-responders on patient characteristics are made by Chi-square tests (Fisher’s exact tests if sample size for any cell of table is less than 5) for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables. Of these variables only age, cyto-genetic status, and treatment were statistically significant for responders (CR) versus non-responders (NR). p value<0.01.