Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Oct 3;12(12):10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0692. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0692

Table 2.

BH3 Profiling assayed biomarkers and respective significances in response discrimination.

BH3 Peptide Mean %Priming +/− SD p-value* AUC [95%CI]

NR CR
BIM 70.1 ± 32.6 88.2 ± 17.6 0.023 0.68 [0.53,0.82]
BIM(0.1) 13.8 ± 13.4 36.8 ± 21.2 0.0000018 0.83 [0.72,0.93]
PUMA 44.7 ± 29.5 64.0 ± 22.7 0.017 0.69 [0.54,0.84]
PUMA(10) 33.3 ± 24.3 50.4 ± 23.7 0.0064 0.71 [0.58,0.85]
NOXA 26.3 ± 15.5 35.1 ± 24.9 0.20 0.60 [0.46,0.75]
BAD 33.2 ± 29.6 52.7 ± 24.3 0.014 0.70 [0.55,0.85]
BMF 45.6 ± 31.6 64.4 ± 24.9 0.016 0.69 [0.53,0.84]
HRK 20.8 ± 22.4 36.6 ± 22.4 0.010 0.72 [0.57,0.88]
PUMA2A 10.8 ± 19.5 16.1 ± 18.9 0.16 0.61 [0.45,0.78]

Summary of the mean % priming (±S.D), p-values and areas under the curve (AUC) for all profiling biomarkers analyzed for non-response (NR) and clinical response (CR) AML patient specimens. BIM(0.1) was identified as a highly significant biomarker (p<0.001 and AUC>0.80) PUMA(10) was also (borderline) statistically significant (p<0.007). Statistical significance was by Mann-Whitney Analysis.