Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Jan;145(1):10.14219/jada.2013.21. doi: 10.14219/jada.2013.21

Table 4.

Adjusted1 mean percent concordance and association with high performers according to practice/practitioner characteristics, overall and according to whether practiced in PDA/HP

Characteristic Mean
Percent
Concordant
p-value High Performers
Odds
Ratio
95%
Confidence
Interval
p-value
ALL
Gender: Female vs. Male
PDA/HP: Yes vs. No
Graduated before 1990 vs. 1990 or later
70 vs. 67
77 vs. 60
65 vs. 62
0.06
<0.001
0.02
2.0
6.0
1.7
1.2−3.2
3.6−10.1
1.1−2.6
0.007
<0.001
0.01
STRATIFIED BY PDA/HP
Among Non-PDA/HP practitioners
Gender: Female vs. Male
Graduated before 1990 vs. 1990 or later
62 vs. 58
62 vs. 57
0.08
0.01
2.2
1.7
1.3−3.8
1.1−2.8
0.004
0.02
Among PDA/HP practitioners
Gender: Female vs. Male
Graduated before 1990 vs. 1990 or later
78 vs. 76
77 vs. 78
0.5
0.8
1.2
1.7
0.4−3.3
0.6−4.4
0.7
0.3
1

Adjusted for characteristics listed.