. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: J AAPOS. 2013 Oct;17(5):10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.05.015. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.05.015

Table 4.

Comparison of noncycloplegic PeWE measurements (near and distant target conditions) to cycloplegic Rmax measurements for encounters on which all 3 measurements were obtained

Measure	Instrument/condition	Mean	SD	Mean difference from cRmax	SD of difference	Correlation with cRmax (r)
M	Rmax	0.80	1.05
	PeWE, near fixation	−1.25	0.95	2.05	1.01	0.50
	PeWE, distance fixation	−0.15	0.82	0.94	0.85	0.61^a
J0	Rmax	0.50	0.57
	PeWE, near fixation	0.78	0.67	−0.28^a	0.31	0.88^a
	PeWE, distance fixation	0.72	0.64	−0.23^a	0.31	0.87^a
J45	Rmax	0.00	0.22
	PeWE, near fixation	−0.17	0.33	0.17^a	0.48	−0.45^a
	PeWE, distance fixation	−0.16	0.29	0.16^a	0.44	−0.46^a

Rmax, cycloplegic autorefraction using the Retinomax K-plus2; PeWE, noncycloplegic pediatric wavefront evaluator.

Statistically significant, P < 0.001.