Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Addict Res Ther. 2013 Apr 26;Suppl 7:10.4172/2155-6105.S7-006. doi: 10.4172/2155-6105.S7-006

Table 2.

CVLT Performance

CVLT Measure BD (n=22) LD (n= 29) p-value
 Trial 1 7.7 ± 1.6 9.0 ± 2.5 .04
 Trial 2 10.6 ± 2.8 12.0 ± 2.2 .05
 Learning Slope 1.7 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 0.4 <.005
 List B 8.0 ± 2.5 8.2 ± 2.7 ns
Short Delay
  Free Recall 12.9 ± 3.0 13.4 ± 2.6 ns
  Cued Recall 13.4 ± 2.9 13.9 ± 2.0 ns
Long Delay
  Free Recall 13.7 ± 2.4 14.0 ± 2.2 ns
  Cued Recall 13.7 ± 2.5 13.9 ± 2.3 ns
Recognition
 Hits 15.2 ± 1.2 15.8 ± 0.4 .02
 False alarms 0.81 ± 1.5 0.75 ± 1.5 ns
 Misses 0.81 ± 1.2 0.21 ± 0.41 .02
Semantic Clusters (chance adjusted)
 Trial 1 1.3 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.5 .04
 Trial 2 10.6 ± 2.8 12.0 ± 2.2 .05
 Total Trials 1–5 2.7 ± 3.4 3.0 ± 4.0 ns

Data represent mean values ± SD. CVLT, California Verbal Learning Task.