Table 1.

Means, SDs, and correlations of the variables used in this study (N = 608 to 633).

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
(1) EPDS	—
(2) NS	0.15***	—
(3) HA	0.35***	−0.25***	—
(4) RD	−0.08	0.3	−0.01	—
(5) PS	0.08	−0.16***	−0.03	0.11**	—
(6) SD	−0.56***	−0.23***	−0.48***	0.14**	0.05	—
(7) CO	−0.29***	−0.22***	−0.25***	0.45***	0.18***	0.50***	—
(8) ST	0.14**	0.21***	−0.22***	0.01	0.21	−0.11**	0.07	—
(9) Age	−0.13**	−0.01	−0.11**	−0.07	0.03	0.12**	0.11*	0.07	—
(10) Partner's age	−0.09*	−0.03	−0.13**	−0.13**	0.03	0.12**	0.05	0.09*	0.68***	—
(11) No. of children	0.05	−0.04	0.4	−0.03	0.04	−0.02	0.03	−0.03	0.21***	0.14**	—
(12) Pregnancy complications	0.04	−0.06	−0.01	0.03	0.04	−0.01	0.09*	0.07	0.11**	0.11**	−0.01	—
(13) Gestational week	−0.02	−0.00	−0.11**	−0.05	0.01	0.03	−0.03	0.04	0.06	−0.00	−0.02	−0.05	—
(14) Response to pregnancy	0.16***	0.04	0.03	−0.12**	−0.06	−0.11**	−0.09*	−0.08	−0.03	0.01	0.26***	−0.01	0.05	—
(15) Desire for baby	−0.13**	−0.05	0.00	0.08*	0.02	0.06	0.05	0.01	0.21***	0.15***	−0.18***	0.6	−0.04	−0.47***	—
Mean	4.5	25.5	33.1	29.0	16.3	43.7	50.0	17.2	30.0	32.1	0.7	0.2	34.1	1.3	3.3
SD	4.1	6.0	7.2	4.6	3.0	8.1	6.4	5.8	4.9	5.9	0.8	0.5	3.6	0.6	1.0
Skewness	1.5	−0.1	−0.2	−0.01	0.1	−0.4	−0.1	0.3	0.1	0.7	1.1	2.5	−1.4	2.4	−0.3
Cronbach's alpha									—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Because pregnancy complications and response to pregnancy were more 2.0 positively skewed, both of them were log-transformed for correlations with other variables. *P<0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.