Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul-Aug;20(4):427–434. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000400007

Table 4.

Multiple comparisons for proportions - fracture types

Compare Diff q Conclusion
Group 3 vs 1 34.32 3.88 Reject Ho
Group 3 vs 2 15.97 1.8 Fail to Reject Ho
Group 3 vs 4 5.45 0.61 Fail to Reject Ho
Group 4 vs 1 28.86 3.26 Fail to Reject Ho
Group 4 vs 2 10.52 1.19 Fail to Reject Ho
Group 2 vs 1 18.34 2.07 Fail to Reject Ho

Ho: There is not a significant difference between proportions

H1: There is a significant difference between proportions