Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 26;2013(47):216–223. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt031

Table 2.

Sample characteristics (N = 36 articles)

% N
Publication year
 2000–2003 5.6 2
 2005–2008 44.4 16
 2009–2012 50.0 18
Cancer type
 Breast 44.4 16
 Prostate 8.3 3
 Colorectal 2.8 1
 Hematologic 5.6 2
 Pancreatic 2.8 1
 Childhood cancers 11.1 4
 Multiple cancers 25.0 9
Phase of cancer care continuum
 Detection/screening 5.6 2
 Treatment 16.7 6
 Treatment and posttreatment/ survivorship 47.2 17
 Posttreatment/survivorship 30.6 11
Developmental stage of participants
 Adolescent 2.8 1
 Adult 97.2 35
Study design
 Descriptive 22.2 8
 Observational 55.6 20
 Experimental 22.2 8
Type of data collected
 Quantitative 72.2 26
 Qualitative 11.1 4
 Quantitative and qualitative 16.7 6
New media components*
 Networked via internet 93.9 31
 Interactive website 48.5 16
 Personalized feedback 39.4 13
 Personalized content 18.2 6
 Synchronous conferencing 9.1 3
 Asynchronous communication 27.3 9
 Interactive e-games 3.0 1
 Video sharing 3.0 1
 Blogging/microblogging 12.1 4
Addresses racial/ethnic disparities?
 Yes 30.6 11
 No 69.4 25
Proportion of sample representing underserved racial/ethnic groups
 0%–19% 27.8 10
 20%–39% 36.1 13
 40%–59% 8.3 3
 60%–79% 0.0 0
 80%–100% 5.6 2
 Not reported 22.2 8

* Does not equal 100% because some interventions had more than new media element. If an intervention was the focus of more than one study, media elements were not repeated in the count.