Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Dec 8;44(5):10.1016/j.jsat.2012.11.003. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.11.003

Table 4. The effect of treatment condition and DBD status on changes in maternal and paternal parenting behavior from intake to 9 month follow-up.

Estimated Model
Parameter
Maternal
Positive
Involvement
Maternal
Deficient
Monitoring
Maternal
Ineffective
Discipline
Paternal
Positive
Involvement
Paternal
Deficient
Monitoring
Paternal
Ineffective
Discipline

β SE d β SE d β SE d β SE d β SE d β SE d

Model 1
DBD Status −0.09 0.06 0.17 0.12* 0.06 0.25 0.18** 0.06 0.36 −0.16* 0.07 0.33 0.11 0.07 0.23 0.04 0.07 0.08
Treatment Condition 0.05 0.06 0.10 −0.02 0.06 0.04 −0.17** 0.06 0.33 −0.01 0.07 0.02 −0.06 0.07 0.12 −0.03 0.07 0.06
Model 2
DBD ×
Treatment Condition
−0.43 1.01 0.11 −0.04 0.98 0.01 1.05 0.90 0.26 1.68 1.00 0.50 0.99 1.00 0.29 3.07** 0.99 0.90

Contrasts

DBD+:
EXP/COTROL
0.03 0.07 0.06 −0.02 0.07 0.04 −0.10 0.07 0.22 0.07 0.08 0.16 −0.01 0.08 0.01 0.13 0.08 0.28
DBD:
EXP/CONTROL
0.05 0.06 0.16 −0.02 0.06 0.03 −0.17** 0.06 0.48 −0.01 0.07 0.34 −0.06 0.07 0.30 −0.03** 0.07 0.62

Note: DBD = Disruptive behavior disorder. EXP = Experimental. β = standardized beta estimates; SE= standard error. d= Cohen’s effect size. Maternal reports n = 68. Paternal reports n = 50 for Positive Involvement and Deficient Monitoring and n = 51 for Negative Discipline.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p <.001.