Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2013 Dec;25(8 0):10.1177/0898264313497796. doi: 10.1177/0898264313497796

Table 5.

Cox Hazard Models of the Relationship between Baseline Driving Status and Time to Death, Controlling for Baseline Health

Predictor Entire Sample Small Cities Large Cities

B (SE) HR 95% CI B (SE) HR 95% CI B (SE) HR 95% CI
Model 1
Driving Status 0.48 (0.17) 1.62** 1.16 – 2.27 0.73 (0.31) 2.08* 1.13 – 3.81 0.38 (0.21) 1.46 0.97 – 2.19
SF-36 Physical Role −0.30 (0.07) 0.74** 0.65 – 0.84 −0.36 (0.11) 0.70** 0.56 – 0.87 −0.28 (0.08) 0.76** 0.65 – 0.89
Model 2
Driving Status 0.39 (0.17) 1.48* 1.05 – 2.08 0.70 (0.31) 2.00* 1.09 – 3.69 0.28 (0.21) 1.32 0.87 – 1.99
SF-36 Physical Functioning −0.37 (0.06) 0.70** 0.61 – 0.78 −0.48 (0.11) 0.62** 0.50 – 0.76 −0.32 (0.08) 0.72** 0.62 – 0.85
Model 3
Driving Status 0.48 (0.17) 1.62** 1.15 – 2.27 0.75 (0.31) 2.11* 1.15 – 3.86 0.36 (0.21) 1.44 0.95 – 2.16
SF-36 Social Functioning −0.19 (0.06) 0.82** 0.74 – 0.92 −0.22 (0.10) 0.81* 0.67 – 0.97 −0.19 (0.07) 0.83** 0.72 – 0.95
Model 4
Driving Status 0.33 (0.18) 1.39 0.99 – 1.96 0.61 (0.31) 1.84* 1.01 – 3.38 0.21 (0.21) 1.23 0.81 – 1.88
General Health Composite −0.44 (0.06) 0.64** 0.57 – 0.73 −0.51 (0.10) 0.60** 0.49 – 0.74 −0.41 (0.08) 0.66** 0.56 – 0.78
Model 5
Driving Status 0.35 (0.19) 1.42 0.98 – 2.04 0.69 (0.33) 1.98* 1.03 – 3.81 0.17 (0.23) 1.18 0.76 – 1.85
Turn 360 Testa 0.17 (0.05) 1.18** 1.08 – 1.29 −0.09 (0.14) 0.91 0.69 – 1.21 0.20 (0.05) 1.22** 1.12 – 1.34

Note. SF-36 = Short Form Health Survey; SE = standard error; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval. The 95% CI was for the HR. Models controlled for baseline age, years of education, sex, and race. Drivers were the reference group.

a

Smaller scores reflect better performance.

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01.