Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Nov 12;118:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.008. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.008

Table 5.

Indirect Effects of Mediators of Kindergarten Number Sense on First Grade Outcomes

First Grade Outcomes Mediators Bootstrap Point Estimate Standard Error 95% CI2
Number Sense Executive Functioning .073* .031 .024 – .154
Attention Problems .199** .071 .088 – .381
Executive Functioning vs. Attention Problems1 −.126 .080 −.318 – .008
Applied Problems Executive Functioning .152** .054 .070 – .287
Attention Problems .156* .064 .059 – .327
Executive Functioning vs. Attention Problems1 −.004 .082 −.179 – .149
Calculation Executive Functioning .069* .031 .020 – .143
Attention Problems .222*** .057 .124 – .355
Executive Functioning vs. Attention Problems1 −.153 .068 −.294 – .025

Note. Mediation effects reflect indirect effects of kindergarten predictors on first grade outcomes through kindergarten mediators (executive functioning, attention problems, and number sense) following Preacher and Hayes (2008). 10000 bootstrap samples.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.

1

Demonstrates whether one mediator is significantly stronger than the other.

2

Bias corrected and accelerated confidence interval.