Table 4.
Intimate partner violence victimization results from logistic regression (n=25,631)
| Main effects | Main effects, adjusted for perpetration | Gender interactions | Gender interactions, adjusted for perpetration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol UD | 1.52 (1.39, 1.66)*** | 1.27 (1.14, 1.42)*** | --- | --- |
| Alcohol UD x Gender | 0.83 (0.72, 0.97)* | 1.14 (0.94, 1.38) | ||
| Males | 1.42 (1.29, 1.58)*** | |||
| Females | 1.71 (1.49, 1.95)*** | |||
| Binge drinking (0–10) | 1.04 (1.02, 1.05)*** | 1.03 (1.01, 1.05)** | --- | --- |
| Binge drinking x Gender | 0.96 (0.93, 0.98)*** | 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) | ||
| Males | 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) | |||
| Females | 1.07 (1.05, 1.08)*** | |||
| Cocaine UD | 1.05 (0.76, 1.44) | 0.64 (0.50, 0.82)** | --- | --- |
| Cocaine UD x Gender | 0.71 (0.36, 1.38) | 0.76 (0.28, 2.09) | ||
| Opioid UD | 1.33 (0.99, 1.79) | 2.20 (1.50, 3.22)*** | --- | --- |
| Opioid UD x Gender | 0.63 (1.01, 2.50)* | 0.52 (0.27, 1.01)a | ||
| Males | 1.10 (0.71, 1.70) | 1.71 (0.89, 3.30) | ||
| Females | 1.75 (1.30, 2.34)*** | 3.27 (2.61, 4.09)*** | ||
| Cannabis UD | 1.66 (1.42, 1.94)*** | 1.81 (1.47, 2.23)*** | --- | --- |
| Cannabis UD x Gender | 0.77 (0.59, 0.99)* | 1.36 (0.81, 2.26) | ||
| Males | 1.52 (1.25, 1.84)*** | |||
| Females | 1.97 (1.60, 2.43)*** |
Note. UD = use disorder. All models adjusted for age, gender, household income, education, race/ethnicity, depression symptoms, and antisocial symptoms. Models also adjusted for victimization where specified in heading. Estimates took into account the sampling and weighting procedures of the survey design.
a
The p-value for the opioid UD x gender odds ratio was 0.052.
*
p<0.05,
**
p<0.01,
***
p<0.001