Table 3.
Positive Themes and Subthemes Related to Facilitating Evidence-Based Practice
Importance of the issue |
• Identifying a high-priority need |
• Clinically driven issues based on observed need from practitioners |
• Salient and congruent |
Characteristics of the evidence |
• Accessible and easy to use |
• Relevant to practice, users, and local context |
• Adapted and translated effectively |
Development of partnerships and a project team |
and engagement of key stakeholders |
• Stakeholder engagement, manager, and frontline buy-in |
• Empower those to become involved and overcome barriers |
to engagement |
• Multidisciplinary project team |
• Development of champions |
• Strategic partnerships (clinical and academic) |
• Shared control and reciprocity |
• Lack of conflict of interest |
Strategic process or choreography |
• Strategic plan required in advance |
• Ensure resources (e.g., supplies, documentation, and equipment) |
• Use of multiple strategies (e.g., education, marketing, etc.) |
• Dealing with conflict: diffuse turf issues, negotiation, |
and consensus building |
• Follow-up, feedback, and celebration: see success that is valued |
• Build capacity for sustainability and continued improvement |
Characteristics of the facilitator |
• Clinical and process expert, not necessarily a content expert |
• Resource versus authority, mentoring, and coaching |
• Ability to broker knowledge, relationships, and support |
across levels (e.g., staff and administration) |
• Effective communicator, resilient, audacious, visionary, |
and passionate about issues |
• Possesses interpersonal, relationship, and marketing skills, |
authenticity, tenacity, and political savvy |