Table 3a.
Results of bootstrapped hierarchical regression analysis for maternal and peer influences predicting peak drinking.
| b (95% CI) | R2 | F | df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 – Background Control Variables
| ||||
| Intercept | 1.93 (1.58, 2.30)** | .02 | 8.03** | 1,346 |
| Living arrangements | 1.40 (.27, 2.68)* | |||
|
| ||||
| Step 2 – Maternal and Peer Influences
| ||||
| Intercept | .85 (.24, 1.54) | .25 | 20.08** | 6,341 |
| Living arrangements | .61 (−.37, 1.64) | |||
| Monitoring | −.07 (−.22, .07) | |||
| Communication | −.08 (−.18, .01) | |||
| Permissiveness | .20 (.06, .37)* | |||
| Modeling | .09 (−.39, .59) | |||
| Friend DDQ | .14 (.09, .20)** | |||
|
| ||||
| Step 3 – Maternal and Peer Interactions
| ||||
| Intercept | .32 (−.31, 1.11) | .26 | 13.00** | 10,337 |
| Living arrangements | .52 (−.46, 1.53) | |||
| Monitoring | −.04 (−.19, .10) | |||
| Communication | −.05 (−.16, .05) | |||
| Permissiveness | .30 (.13, .52) | |||
| Modeling | .36 (−.22, 1.02) | |||
| Friend DDQ | .21 (.09, .30) | |||
| Friend x Monitoring | −.01 (−.02, .01) | |||
| Friend x Communication | .00 (−.02, .01) | |||
| Friend x Permissiveness | −.01 (−.03, .02) | |||
| Friend x Modeling | −.03 (−.10, .04) | |||
Note:
**
p<.01;
*
p<.05.
Significant effects for variables appearing in the preceding block (italicized) are not shown. Living arrangements were coded so 0=living with parents or other family, 1=not living with parents or other family.