Table 3b.
Results of bootstrapped hierarchical regression analysis for maternal and peer influences predicting weekly drinking.
| b (95% CI) | R2 | F | df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 – Background Control Variables
| ||||
| Intercept | 1.71 (1.31, 2.18)** | .04 | 14.82** | 1,346 |
| Living arrangements | 2.40 (.69, 4.25)* | |||
|
| ||||
| Step 2 – Maternal and Peer Influences
| ||||
| Intercept | −.03 (−.68, .77) | .35 | 32.19** | 6,341 |
| Living arrangements | 1.29 (−.09, 2.69) | |||
| Monitoring | −.08 (−.26, .09) | |||
| Communication | −.10 (−.22, .03) | |||
| Permissiveness | .16 (−.01, .35) | |||
| Modeling | .30 (−.33, .92) | |||
| Friend DDQ | .23 (.16, .30)** | |||
|
| ||||
| Step 3 – Maternal and Peer Interactions
| ||||
| Intercept | −.45 (−1.23, .28) | .37 | 21.01** | 10,337 |
| Living arrangements | 1.12 (−.15, 2.45) | |||
| Monitoring | .01 (−.13, .13) | |||
| Communication | −.01 (−.14, .10) | |||
| Permissiveness | .18 (.01, .39) | |||
| Modeling | .01 (−.62, .59) | |||
| Friend DDQ | .28 (.12, .42) | |||
| Friend x Monitoring | −.01 (−.03, .02) | |||
| Friend x Communication | −.01 (−.03, .01) | |||
| Friend x Permissiveness | −.01 (−.03, .03) | |||
| Friend x Modeling | .03 (−.08, .13) | |||
Note:
**
p<.01;
*
p<.05.
Significant effects for variables appearing in the preceding block (italicized) are not shown. Living arrangements were coded so 0=living with parents or other family, 1=not living with parents or other family.