Table 3c.
Results of bootstrapped hierarchical regression analysis for maternal and peer influences predicting consequences.
| b (95% CI) | R2 | F | df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 – Background Control Variables
| ||||
| Intercept | 5.48 (4.37, 6.63)** | .02 | 5.38* | 1,346 |
| Living arrangements | 3.41 (.03, 6.68) | |||
|
| ||||
| Step 2 – Maternal and Peer Influences
| ||||
| Intercept | 1.74 (−.34, 3.81) | .28 | 21.67** | 6,341 |
| Living arrangements | 1.23 (−2.24, 4.38) | |||
| Monitoring | −.09 (−.50, .32) | |||
| Communication | −.32 (−.60, −.05)* | |||
| Permissiveness | .60 (.16, 1.08)* | |||
| Modeling | .66 (−.86, 2.40) | |||
| Friend DDQ | .44 (.30, .59)** | |||
|
| ||||
| Step 3 – Maternal and Peer Interactions
| ||||
| Intercept | 1.02 (−.95, 3.31) | .30 | 14.19** | 10,337 |
| Living arrangements | .79 (−2.82, 3.74) | |||
| Monitoring | −.03 (−.42, .34) | |||
| Communication | −.22 (−.51, .05) | |||
| Permissiveness | .96 (.38, 1.56) | |||
| Modeling | −.94 (−2.52, .37) | |||
| Friend DDQ | .52 (.20, .78) | |||
| Friend x Monitoring | −.01 (−.05, .05) | |||
| Friend x Communication | −.01 (−.05, .03) | |||
| Friend x Permissiveness | −.04 (−.09, .04) | |||
| Friend x Modeling | .17 (−.02, .42) | |||
Note:
**
p<.01;
*
p<.05.
Significant effects for variables appearing in the preceding block (italicized) are not shown. Living arrangements were coded so 0=living with parents or other family, 1=not living with parents or other family.