Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 30;12:117. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-117

Table 4.

Logistic regression model results a

 
 
Blood Cd
 
Urinary Cd/g Cr
 
Urinary Cd
 
Outcome
Exposure
OR (95% CI)
 
OR (95% CI)
 
OR (95% CI)
 
    Crude Adjusted b Crude Adjusted b Crude c Adjusted d
ID
High vs. low Cd
2.50 (1.82-3.43)
2.78 (1.87-4.12)
1.77 (1.08-2.90)
1.37 (0.81-2.34)
1.64 (0.91-2.97)
1.21 (0.64-2.28)
 
Med. vs. low Cd
2.17 (1.72-2.74)
1.90 (1.48-2.43)
1.08 (0.63-1.85)
1.01 (0.58-1.77)
1.17 (0.69-2.00)
1.06 (0.61-1.86)
 
p-trend
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.02
0.22
0.10
0.56
IDA
High vs. low Cd
3.90 (2.11-7.17)
4.02 (1.92-8.41)
1.00 (0.46-2.19)
0.79 (0.35-0.75)
1.78 (0.55-5.73)
0.83 (0.24-2.82)
 
Med. vs. low Cd
2.46 (1.48-4.10)
2.00 (1.17-3.42)
0.82 (0.35-1.89)
0.80 (0.34-1.89)
1.10 (0.35-3.48)
0.83 (0.25-2.77)
 
p-trend
<0.0001
0.0001
0.86
0.48
0.33
0.77
Low SF
High vs. low Cd
2.80 (2.08-3.77)
4.08 (2.36-5.89)
1.62 (1.03-2.55)
1.42 (0.88-2.29)
1.91 (1.10-3.31)
1.63 (0.91-2.92)
 
Med. vs. low Cd
2.50 (2.02-3.11)
2.38 (1.89-3.00)
1.00 (0.61-1.63)
0.99 (0.59-1.63)
1.30 (0.80-2.13)
1.28 (0.76-2.14)
 
p-trend
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.03
0.14
0.02
0.1
High FEP
High vs. low Cd
1.26 (0.95-1.69)
1.36 (0.95-1.95)
1.42 (0.95-2.14)
1.02 (0.66-1.58)
1.47 (0.91-2.38)
1.12 (0.67-1.88)
 
Med. vs. low Cd
1.29 (1.06-1.56)
1.07 (0.88-1.32)
1.16 (0.76-1.75)
0.99 (0.64-1.53)
1.14 (0.75-1.73)
0.99 (0.64-1.54)
 
p-trend
0.013
0.133
0.09
0.91
0.19
0.67
Low TSAT
High vs. low Cd
1.34 (1.06-1.69)
1.74 (1.30-2.34)
1.19 (0.87-1.64)
1.07 (0.77-1.49)
1.12 (0.76-1.65)
0.94 (0.62-1.41)
 
Med. vs. low Cd
1.23 (1.05-1.44)
1.26 (1.07-1.48)
0.84 (0.60-1.16)
0.82 (0.58-1.15)
1.05 (0.75-1.46)
1.02 (0.72-1.43)
  p-trend 0.002 <0.0001 0.27 0.67 0.57 0.76

aCrude and adjusted odds of ID, IDA, low SF, high FEP, and low TSAT for children with high and medium Cd versus low Cd.

bModels adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, PIR, and serum cotinine.

cModels adjusted for UCr only.

dModels adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, PIR, serum cotinine, and UCr.