Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 21;13:1220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1220

Table 4.

Perceived effect of capitation on health provision

Variables Frequency Percentage
Happy with current service provision?
 
 
– Yes
45
83.3
– No
9
16.7
Clients assessing service with NHIS card since capitation?
 
 
– Yes
52
96.3
– No
2
3.7
How will capitation help providers?*
 
 
– Simplifying claims processing
12
22.2
– Sharing financial risk between schemes, providers, subscribers and the introduction of managed competition for providers and choice for patients to increase responsiveness of the health system
20
37.0
– Improving efficiency and effectiveness of health services through more rational resource use and also better provider – patient relationship.
21
38.9
– Improving primary health (PHC) delivery and quality of care and promoting business growth & development
16
29.6
– Other
3
5.6
Think people like capitation?
 
 
– Yes
3
5.6
– No
51
94.4
Turn up of clients increased under capitation as compared to the G-DRG?
 
 
– Yes
3
5.6
– No
51
94.4
Do you think capitation is an improvement on the NHIS?
 
 
– Yes
30
55.6
– No
24
44.4
Do you agree that an acceptable level of quality is being offered by all primary care facilities to all members
 
– Yes
48
94.1
– No
3
5.9
Will providers reduce the number of request for diagnostic test for their clients?
 
 
– Yes
9
17.7
– No
42
82.3
Please provide reasons
 
 
– Because the provider would want to make profit out of the money given?
23
42.6
– Because the provider would want to outsmart the NHIA?
9
16.7
– Because the provider would want to save the reagents for the non NHIS clients?
14
25.9
– All of the above
8
14.8
Has capitation reduced workload in terms of claims processing
 
 
– Yes
42
82.3
– No
9
17.7
Extent of reduction in workload
 
 
– Up to 20%
12
28.6
– 30-50% 30 71.4

(*) = multiple response.