Table 4.
Variables | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Happy with current service provision? |
|
|
– Yes |
45 |
83.3 |
– No |
9 |
16.7 |
Clients assessing service with NHIS card since capitation? |
|
|
– Yes |
52 |
96.3 |
– No |
2 |
3.7 |
How will capitation help providers?* |
|
|
– Simplifying claims processing |
12 |
22.2 |
– Sharing financial risk between schemes, providers, subscribers and the introduction of managed competition for providers and choice for patients to increase responsiveness of the health system |
20 |
37.0 |
– Improving efficiency and effectiveness of health services through more rational resource use and also better provider – patient relationship. |
21 |
38.9 |
– Improving primary health (PHC) delivery and quality of care and promoting business growth & development |
16 |
29.6 |
– Other |
3 |
5.6 |
Think people like capitation? |
|
|
– Yes |
3 |
5.6 |
– No |
51 |
94.4 |
Turn up of clients increased under capitation as compared to the G-DRG? |
|
|
– Yes |
3 |
5.6 |
– No |
51 |
94.4 |
Do you think capitation is an improvement on the NHIS? |
|
|
– Yes |
30 |
55.6 |
– No |
24 |
44.4 |
Do you agree that an acceptable level of quality is being offered by all primary care facilities to all members |
|
|
– Yes |
48 |
94.1 |
– No |
3 |
5.9 |
Will providers reduce the number of request for diagnostic test for their clients? |
|
|
– Yes |
9 |
17.7 |
– No |
42 |
82.3 |
Please provide reasons |
|
|
– Because the provider would want to make profit out of the money given? |
23 |
42.6 |
– Because the provider would want to outsmart the NHIA? |
9 |
16.7 |
– Because the provider would want to save the reagents for the non NHIS clients? |
14 |
25.9 |
– All of the above |
8 |
14.8 |
Has capitation reduced workload in terms of claims processing |
|
|
– Yes |
42 |
82.3 |
– No |
9 |
17.7 |
Extent of reduction in workload |
|
|
– Up to 20% |
12 |
28.6 |
– 30-50% | 30 | 71.4 |
(*) = multiple response.