Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Invest. 2011 Jul;29(6):10.3109/07357907.2011.585193. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2011.585193

Table 2.

Correlation between number of FoxP3+ cells in SLN and pathological characteristics

Parameter FoxP3 Cell Number p value
Tumor type
Ductal 308.8 ± 151.9 Ductal vs. lobular = NS
Lobular 274.8 ± 86.1 Ductal vs. mixed = NS
Mixed 274.2 ± 86.6 Lobular vs. mixed = NS
Tumor grade
Well differentiated 314.2 ± 115.8 Well vs. moderate = NS
Moderately differentiated 301.5 ± 140.2 Well vs. poor = NS
Poorly differentiated 299.3 ± 161.3 Moderate vs. poor = NS
* Well vs. moderate + poor = NS
HER2/neu status
Not overexpressed 298.2 ± 142.7 NS
Overexpressed 305.5 ± 144.0
Lymphovascular invasion
No 302.6 ± 167.6
Yes 304.4 ± 133.4 NS
SLN status
Negative 278.2 ± 107.2 Neg vs. ITC = NS; ITC vs. micro = NS
Isolated tumor cells 335.5 ± 178.2 Neg vs. micro = NS; ITC vs. Macro = NS
Micrometastases 296.1 ± 160.5 Negative vs. macro = NS
Macrometastasis 314.0 ± 141.1 Micro vs. macro = NS Negative vs. ITC + Micro + Macro = NS
*

Due to their similarity to each other and their relative dissimilarity with the well-differentiated tumors in terms of mean FoxP3+ cell number, the moderate and poor tumor grades were combined. Because of the low number of well-differentiated tumors, lack of significant difference may reflect low statistical power.