Table 2.
Parameter | FoxP3 Cell Number | p value |
---|---|---|
Tumor type | ||
Ductal | 308.8 ± 151.9 | Ductal vs. lobular = NS |
Lobular | 274.8 ± 86.1 | Ductal vs. mixed = NS |
Mixed | 274.2 ± 86.6 | Lobular vs. mixed = NS |
Tumor grade | ||
Well differentiated | 314.2 ± 115.8 | Well vs. moderate = NS |
Moderately differentiated | 301.5 ± 140.2 | Well vs. poor = NS |
Poorly differentiated | 299.3 ± 161.3 | Moderate vs. poor = NS * Well vs. moderate + poor = NS |
HER2/neu status | ||
Not overexpressed | 298.2 ± 142.7 | NS |
Overexpressed | 305.5 ± 144.0 | |
Lymphovascular invasion | ||
No | 302.6 ± 167.6 | |
Yes | 304.4 ± 133.4 | NS |
SLN status | ||
Negative | 278.2 ± 107.2 | Neg vs. ITC = NS; ITC vs. micro = NS |
Isolated tumor cells | 335.5 ± 178.2 | Neg vs. micro = NS; ITC vs. Macro = NS |
Micrometastases | 296.1 ± 160.5 | Negative vs. macro = NS |
Macrometastasis | 314.0 ± 141.1 | Micro vs. macro = NS Negative vs. ITC + Micro + Macro = NS |
Due to their similarity to each other and their relative dissimilarity with the well-differentiated tumors in terms of mean FoxP3+ cell number, the moderate and poor tumor grades were combined. Because of the low number of well-differentiated tumors, lack of significant difference may reflect low statistical power.