Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2013 Dec;19(12):10.1002/lt.23753. doi: 10.1002/lt.23753

Table 3.

Univariate Analysis of Predictors of Dropout Due to Tumor Progression or Death by Competing Risks

Univariate SHR (95% CI) p-value
Patient Characteristics at Listing
Age (per year) 0.98 (0.96–1.01) 0.21
Female Gender 0.93 (0.57–1.52) 0.78
Etiology of liver disease (vs HCV)
HBV 0.73 (0.44–1.21) 0.22
Others 0.81 (0.44–1.5) 0.5
MELD (per point) 1.04 (1.01–1.09) 0.049
Child’s C vs A 1.65 (0.87–3.12) 0.13
Child’s B vs A 1.20 (0.77–1.86) 0.42
Tumor Characteristics at Listing
3 lesions vs 1 lesion 2–3cm 7.76 (3.63–16.58) <0.001
1 lesion 3.1–5cm vs 1 lesion 2–3cm 4.31 (2.32–8.01) <0.001
2 lesions vs 1 lesion 2–3cm 2.85 (1.42–5.72) 0.003
AFP (ln) 1.21 (1.11–1.32) <0.001
AFP>1000 vs ≤1000 2.59 (1.42–4.72) 0.002
AFP>500 vs ≤500 3.42 (2.03–5.74) <0.001
AFP>300 vs ≤300 2.35 (1.43–3.86) 0.001
AFP>100 vs ≤100 2.01 (1.31–3.09) 0.001
AFP>20 vs ≤20 1.91 (1.26–2.88) 0.002
Type of first LRT (versus TACE)
RFA 1.10 (0.67–1.8) 0.72
Percutaneous ethanol injection 1.30 (0.15–11.36) 0.82
Radiographic and AFP Response to first LRT
Partial Response vs Complete Response 1.86 (0.98–3.54) 0.06
Stable Disease vs Complete Response 5.75 (3.42–9.66) <0.001
Progressive Disease vs Complete Response 25.62 (12.03–54.54) <0.001
AFP (ln) after 1st LRT 1.29 (1.16–1.44) <0.001
AFP>1000 vs ≤1000 after 1st LRT 4.05 (1.82–9.00) 0.001
AFP>500 vs ≤500 after 1st LRT 4.93 (2.70–8.98) <0.001
AFP>300 vs ≤300 after 1st LRT 3.28 (1.79–6.01) <0.001
AFP>100 vs ≤100 after 1st LRT 2.78 (1.64–4.72) <0.001
AFP>20 vs ≤20 after 1st LRT 2.16 (1.35–3.46) 0.001