Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2013 Sep 30;59(4):1532–1542. doi: 10.1002/hep.26556

Table 7. Bias, Precision and Accuracy of 6-Variable MDRD and CKD-EPI Creatinine-Cystatin C Equations in 72 Subjects with Cirrhosis Stratified by Level of mGFR.

6-Variable MDRD CKD-EPI Creatinine-Cystatin C
(2012)
mGFR ≥ 60
ml/min/1.73m2
Bias −4.89 4.75
P value 0.0003
Precision* 27.08 26.30
P Value 0.721
Accuracy (I-P30)* 33.33 21.57
P Value 0.109
Accuracy (I-P20)* 47.06 49.02
P Value 1.000
Accuracy (RMSE)* 27.52 26.72
P Value 0.781
mGFR < 60
ml/min/1.73m2
Bias −10.04 −5.11
P value 0.028
Precision* 13.65 11.96
P Value 0.473
Accuracy (I-P30)* 38.10 28.57
P Value 0.688
Accuracy (I-P20)* 47.62 33.33
P Value 0.453
Accuracy (RMSE)* 16.95 13.01
P Value 0.213

mGFR=GFR measured by non-radiolabeled iothalamate plasma clearance (gold standard)

eGFR=Estimated GFR

Difference score (DS)=mGFR-eGFR for each subject

Bias=Mean DS

Precision=Standard deviation of DS

Accuracy=Percentage of eGFRs that differed by greater than 30% (1-P30) or 20% (1-P20) of mGFRs or root mean square error (RMSE)

*

Lower values for precision and accuracy [(1-P30), (1-P20) and RMSE] indicate higher precision and accuracy for 6-variable MDRD and CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equations

P values compare the performance of CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C (2012) to 6-variable MDRD equation. Note, the P-values for bias reflect difference in the location of bias, not the magnitude.