Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Methods Med Res. 2012 Mar 15;25(1):101–117. doi: 10.1177/0962280212441965

Table 6.

Analysis results of Baylor AD dataset under the final selected model (M3: the model assuming conditional independence in measurements of y and conditional dependence in measurements of x).

PMSD 95% CI
Outcome model
 Int −0.518.990 −3.213, 0.854
x 3.3011.029 1.900, 6.014
 Pre-prog −1.698.268 −2.254, −1.195
 Age −0.098.197 −0.450, 0.342
 IQ 0.839.185 0.462, 1.192
Exposure model
 Int 2.824.397 2.078, 3.648
 Pre-prog −0.728.260 −1.274, −0.242
 Age −0.503.199 −0.943, −0.148
 IQ 0.846.222 0.474, 1.349
MMSE
p 0.975.014 0.943, 0.997
q 0.795.046 0.703, 0.883
ADAS
p 0.814.027 0.761, 0.867
q 0.906.030 0.844, 0.907
CDR-Total
p 0.986.010 0.962, 0.999
q 0.796.143 0.568, 0.996
CDR-SB
p 0.989.008 0.970, 0.999
q 0.673.120 0.504, 0.880

MMSE: Mini-Mental Status Exam; ADAS: Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; CDR-Total: Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Total; CDR-SB: Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes; CI: Credible interval; Pre-prog: log pre-progression rate; age: standardized age; and IQ: standardized premorbid IQ.