Table 3.

Differences between poor and high quality sleep by housing, health, and individual characteristics among male Latino farmworkers in North Carolina, 2010

	N = 369b farmworkers
	Poor quality sleep (≥54) n = 90		Good quality sleep (<4) n = 279		p valuec
	na	%	na	%
Housing unit indicators
Number of people in housing unit (mean, SD)	15.22	15.57	16.95	17.03	0.63
Housing type					0.84
Trailer	22	24.4	77	27.6
House	39	43.3	116	41.6
Other	29	32.2	86	30.8
Air conditioning used previous month	27	30.0	126	45.3	0.01
Sleeping room indicators
Shares sleeping room	78	86.7	234	83.9	0.52
Shares bed	8	8.9	41	14.7	0.16
Is common room	48	53.3	138	49.5	0.52
Other activities disrupt sleep	17	19.8	53	19.6	0.97
Lacks functioning windows	13	14.4	29	10.4	0.29
Lacks functioning screen	22	24.4	59	21.1	0.51
Height violation	5	5.6	8	2.9	0.23
Square foot/crowding violation	8	8.9	39	14.3	0.18
Rodent infestation	23	25.6	72	25.8	0.96
Cockroach infestation	41	45.6	101	36.2	0.11
No fan available	19	21.1	61	21.9	0.88
Index of sleeping room quality using average of the 11 SR indicators (mean, SD)	0.29	0.14	0.27	0.14	0.56
Health indicators
Self-rated health					0.02
Good–Excellent health	37	42.0	155	55.8
Fair or Poor health	51	58.0	123	44.2
Elevated musculoskeletal pain	27	30.0	31	11.1	<0.001
Elevated depressive symptoms	30	33.3	30	11.2	<0.001
Anxiety t-score (mean, SD)	51.93	8.63	46.84	8.36	<0.001
Obese (BMI ≥ 30)	19	21.6	62	22.6	0.84
Behaviors
Alcohol misuse	45	50.0	139	50.2	0.98
Current smoker	30	33.3	101	36.2	0.62
Individual characteristics
Age ≥40 years	23	25.6	75	26.9	0.80
Married or living as married	60	66.7	180	64.5	0.71

^aCount (% yes) unless otherwise noted

^b2 ppts with missing sleep quality data

^cχ² test for categorical variables, t test/non-parametric for continuous