Table 1.
BPSD, effect sizes and p values
First author | Design | SCU vs. n-SCU, n | Results | Assessment instrument | p value | Cohen's d (baseline) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
De Rooij [10] | quasi-experimental, longitudinad | 51 vs. 51 | – social engagement | NPI [62] | <0.01a | not available |
– depression | n.s.a | |||||
– behavioral problems | n.s.a | |||||
30 vs. 47 | – social engagement | n.s.a | ||||
– depression | <0.10a | |||||
– behavioral problems | n.s.a | |||||
Abrahamson [39] | Interviews, random, cross-sectional | 665 vs. 12,442 | – depression – anxiety | MDS [63] | 0.743 0.029 | not available |
Nazir [42] | cohort study | 2,843 vs. 23,322 | – worsening behavior | MDS | <0.001a | not available |
– more verbally abusive | 0.399a | |||||
– more physically abusive | 0.049a | |||||
– more socially | 0.063a | |||||
inappropriate | <0.001a | |||||
– growing resistance to care | ||||||
Verbeek [12] | quasi-experimental, longitudinal, controlled d | 124 vs. 135 | – neuropsychiatry | NPI | n.s.a | 0.04 |
– agitation | CMAI-D [64] | 0.035a | −0.02 | |||
Weyerer [31] | cross-sectional, randomly selected, matched | 594 vs. 573 | – neuropsychiatry | NPI | n.s. | 0.07 |
– agitation | CMAI [65] | <0.001 | 0.38 | |||
Te Boekhorst [13] | quasi-experimental, longitudinal, matched, controlled d | 67 vs. 97 | – depression | RMBPC [66] | n.s.a | not available |
– behavior | n.s.a | |||||
– neuropsychiatry | NPI | n.s.a | ||||
– social engagement | RISE [67] | <0.05a | ||||
Selbaek [26] | cross-sectional | 313 vs. 762 | – delusions | NPI | ≥0.001 | not available |
– hallucination | ≥0.001 | |||||
– depression | n.s. | |||||
– anxiety | ≥0.01 | |||||
– euphoria | ≥0.001 | |||||
– agression/agitation | ≥0.001 | |||||
– apathy | n.s. | |||||
– disinhibition | n.s. | |||||
– aberrant motor behavior | ≥0.01 | |||||
Nobili [9] | longitudinal comparative | 72 vs. 72 | – neuropsychiatry | NPI | 0.0001a | −0.74 |
Pekkarinen [33] | cross-sectional | 390 vs. 587 | – behavioral problems | LRAI [68] | <0.001 | 1.16 |
Morgan [37] | experimental, cross-sectional | 186 vs. 169 | – exposure to disruptive behavior | EDB [69] | <0.01 | −0.028 |
EAC [69] | <0.05 | −0.027 | ||||
– exposure to aggression | ||||||
Sloane [32] | cross-sectional, random | 773 vs. 479 | – behavioral problems | CMAI | n.s. | -0.001 |
– depressive symptom | Cornell [70] | 0.001 | 0.007 | |||
– social functioning | no standardized | 0.001 | 0.012 | |||
– social withdrawal | instrumentb | 0.001 | −0.015 | |||
MOSES [71] | ||||||
Reimer [14] | matched groups e | 62 vs. 59 | – agitation | CMAI | n.s. | not available |
– social withdrawal | MOSES | n.s. | ||||
– affect (anxiety) | AARS [72] | n.s. | ||||
– socially appropriate | Pleasant Events | n.s. | ||||
behavior | scale [73] | |||||
Warren [38] | longitudinal, controlled | 44 vs. 36 | – depression | Cornell | not | −0.06 |
– psychosocial functioning | MOSES | available | 1.82 | |||
Chappel [25] | experimental, longitudinal, controlled | total: 323 | – agitation | CMAI | n.s.a | not available |
– social skills | MAS-R [74] | <0.05a | ||||
– affect | FTQ | n.s.a | ||||
Leon [21] | experimental field study | 432 vs. 164 | – aggressive behavior | CMAI | n.s. | 0.05 |
– disruptive behavior | MDS | <0.01 | 0.24 | |||
Frisoni [34] | longitudinal, controlled | 31 vs. 35 | – delusions | NPI | not available | 0.33 |
– hallucinations | 0.44 | |||||
– agitation | 0.46 | |||||
– anxiety | 0.27 | |||||
– euphoria/elation | −0.07 | |||||
– disinhibition | 0.12 | |||||
– irritability/lability | 0.42 | |||||
– abberant motor behavior | 0.18 | |||||
– sleep | 0.20 | |||||
– total neuropsychiatry | 0.64 | |||||
– agitation | CMAI | 0.49 | ||||
– depression | Cornell | 1.05 | ||||
Saxton [15] | longitudinal, matched, controllede | 26 vs. 19 | – social/cognitive | NHBPS [75] | n.s.a | 0.56 |
Kovach [36] | behavioral observations | 23 vs. 14 | – functional behavior | no standardized instrumentc | not available | −0.50 |
Swanson [35] | quasi-experimental, longitudinal | 13 vs. 9 | – noncognitive behavior | ADAS [76] | n.s.a | 0.65 |
Lindesay [28] | cross-sectionalf | 27 vs. 29 | – depression | DSS [77] | not available | 0.11 |
– activity disturbance | ABRS [78] | 0.28 | ||||
– aggressivity | −0.21 | |||||
Chafetz [46] | quasi-experimental, longitudinal | 12 vs. 8 | – behavior | BRF [79] | n.s.a | not available |
Holmes [20] | quasi-experimental, longitudinal | 49 vs. 44 | – disturbing behavior total | INCARE [80] | n.s.b | 0.47 |
score | n.s.b | 0.36 | ||||
– depression | 0.01b | −0.36 | ||||
– social activities |
MDS = Minimum data set 2.0 section E4; NPI = Neuropsychiatric Inventory; CMAI(-D) = Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (-Dutch version); RMBPC = Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist; RISE = Revised Index of Social Engagement from the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI); LRAI = Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument; EDB = Exposure to Disruptive Behaviours subscale; EAC = Exposure to Aggression during Caregiving subscale; Cornell = Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia; MOSES = Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects; AARS = Apparent Affect Rating Scale; MAS-R = Multifocus Assessment Scale-Revised; FTQ = Feeling Tone Questionnaire (no statistics available on research initiation); NHBPS = Nursing Home Behavioral Problem Scale; ADAS = Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale; DSS = Depressive Signs Scale; ABRS = Adaptive Behaviour Rating Scale; BRF = Behaviour Rating Form; INCARE = Institutional Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation; n.s. = not significant.
Over time;
17 items of participation in social activities;
checklist for behavioural mapping in long-term care facilities;
small-scale, homelike SCU/SCU comparison;
small-scale, homelike SCU/n-SCU comparison;
SCU/n-SCU with mixed-sex population.