Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Feb 11;104(5):10.1037/a0031435. doi: 10.1037/a0031435

Table 4.

Romantic avoidance (ECR-R avoidance) as a function of covariates and developmental antecedents.

Predictor B SE β p
Covariates
 Gender −.14 .08 −.06 .08
Ethnicity −.25 .10 −.09 .01
 Maternal education .03 .02 .07 .10
 Family income .04 .14 .01 .77
Romantic anxiety .26 .03 .27 < .01
Caregiving environnent
 Sensitivity (intercept) .01 .05 .01 .82
Sensitivity (slope) −.14 .04 −.12 < .01
 Maternal depression (intercept) −.00 .04 −.00 .99
 Maternal depression (slope) .02 .04 .02 .63
 Father absence −.05 .09 −.02 .57
Social competence
 Social competence (intercept) −.06 .06 −.04 .35
Social competence (slope) −.18 .06 −.11 .01
Friendship quality
Friendship quality (intercept) −.21 .04 −.18 < .01
Friendship quality (slope) −.49 .04 −.41 < .01

Note. The intercept for the model was 2.05. The R2 of the model was .33, F(14, 677) = 23.26, p < .05. The R2 of the same model, excluding attachment-related anxiety as a covariate, was .26. Boldface is used to highlight statistically significant predictors. Gender was coded as 0 for female and 1 for male. Ethnicity was coded as 1 for White/non-Hispanic and 0 otherwise.