Table 3.
All Cases n (%) [95%CI] |
Twin Cities (MSP) n (%) [95% CI] |
Boston (BMA) n (%) [95%CI] |
|
---|---|---|---|
Sought treatment⋄ | 586 (56.5) [53.5, 59.4] | 405 (52.0) [48.5, 55.5] | 181 (70.0) [64.3, 75.6] |
| |||
Clinicians seen**‡ | |||
1 or 2 | 329 (59.0) [55.0, 63.0] | 241 (62.7) [58.0, 67.50] | 88 (50.8) [43.5, 58.1] |
3 or 4 | 129 (23.1) [19.7, 26.6] | 70 (18.6) [14.6, 22.5] | 59 (32.8) [25.8, 39.8] |
5 or more | 101 (17.9) [14.8, 21.0] | 70 (18.7) [14.8. 22.6] | 31 (16.4) [11.0, 21.8] |
Diagnosis** | 264 (48.0) [44.0, 52.0] | 148 (39.0) [34.1, 43.9] | 116 (67.4) [60.5, 74.4] |
Defined as pain on contact in the last 6 months that limited or prevented intercourse
Adjusted for age at time of survey, race, and length of time suffering from vulvodynia
Risk Difference for sought treatment (Boston versus Twin Cities) was 18 (95%CI=11.3, 24.6)
Only among women who sought treatment
24 women from the Twin Cities and 3 women from Boston who failed to provide number of clinicians seen or were missing key covariate information are not included in the analysis