Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep 28;210(1):10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.033. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.033

Table 3.

Healthcare seeking among women with vulvodynia* age 18 to 40 years from two geographical locations: Number and adjusted proportions

All Cases
n (%) [95%CI]
Twin Cities (MSP)
n (%) [95% CI]
Boston (BMA)
n (%) [95%CI]
Sought treatment 586 (56.5) [53.5, 59.4] 405 (52.0) [48.5, 55.5] 181 (70.0) [64.3, 75.6]

Clinicians seen**
 1 or 2 329 (59.0) [55.0, 63.0] 241 (62.7) [58.0, 67.50] 88 (50.8) [43.5, 58.1]
 3 or 4 129 (23.1) [19.7, 26.6] 70 (18.6) [14.6, 22.5] 59 (32.8) [25.8, 39.8]
 5 or more 101 (17.9) [14.8, 21.0] 70 (18.7) [14.8. 22.6] 31 (16.4) [11.0, 21.8]
Diagnosis** 264 (48.0) [44.0, 52.0] 148 (39.0) [34.1, 43.9] 116 (67.4) [60.5, 74.4]
*

Defined as pain on contact in the last 6 months that limited or prevented intercourse

Adjusted for age at time of survey, race, and length of time suffering from vulvodynia

Risk Difference for sought treatment (Boston versus Twin Cities) was 18 (95%CI=11.3, 24.6)

**

Only among women who sought treatment

24 women from the Twin Cities and 3 women from Boston who failed to provide number of clinicians seen or were missing key covariate information are not included in the analysis