Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;40(1):169–180. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs151

Table 2.

Spatial Variation in Unsmoothed and Smoothed Relative Risks of Psychotic Syndromes After Indirect Standardization

Outcome Observed Subjects Expected Subjects Unsmoothed SIRa Smoothed RRb
Model 1 (Unstructured) Model 2 (Structured) Model 3 (Convolution) Model 4 (Mixed)
Nonaffective psychoses (F20-29)
    Minimum 0 2.90 0.00 0.46 0.54 0.48 0.44
    5th percentile 1 3.71 0.18 0.49 0.62 0.48 0.54
    Median 5.5 5.49 0.88 0.97 0.93 0.95 1.02
    95th percentile 11 7.52 2.75 1.83 1.89 1.92 2.37
    Maximum 14 8.26 3.24 2.02 2.04 2.05 2.41
    Mean 5.59 5.59 1.03 1.03 1.02 1.03 1.11
DIC 279.54 273.40 273.88 262.62
MAPE 2.60 2.60 2.58 2.56
MSPE 11.39 11.30 11.18 11.03
Affective psychoses (F30-33)
    Minimum 0 1.14 0.00 0.96 0.93 0.91 0.95
    5th percentile 0 1.41 0.00 0.97 0.94 0.91 0.95
    Median 2 2.01 1.03 1.00 0.98 0.98 1.01
    95th percentile 4 2.65 1.94 1.03 1.10 1.11 1.10
    Maximum 5 2.78 2.42 1.05 1.11 1.16 1.16
    Mean 2.04 2.04 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.02
DIC 182.83 182.24 183.24 182.79
MAPE 1.44 1.44 1.43 1.44
MSPE 3.45 3.42 3.41 3.43

Notes: DIC, Deviance Information Criterion; MAPE, Mean Absolute Prediction Error; MSPE, Mean Squared Prediction Error.

aClassical (unsmoothed) Standardized Incidence Ratio–standardized for age, sex, ethnicity, and social class.

bBayesian spatial modeling after standardization for age, sex, ethnicity, and social class. Type of random effects at neighborhood-level in parentheses.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure