Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 15;7(1):322–330.

Table 5.

Correlation of concomitant expression of HIF-1α, MT and SLUG with LNM

LNM
Absent n (%) Present n (%) P-value
HIF-1α/MT <0.001a
(4) Both HIF-1α/MT low expression 30 (83.3) 6 (16.7)
(5) One of HIF-1α/MT high expression 22 (45.8) 26 (54.2) 0.008b
(6) Both HIF-1α/MT high expression 9 (20.0) 36 (80.0)
MT/SLUG <0.001a
(4) Both MT/SLUG low expression 37 (82.2) 8 (17.8)
(5) One of MT/SLUG high expression 18 (43.9) 23 (56.1) 0.002b
(6) Both MT/SLUG high expression 6 (14.0) 37 (86.0)
HIF-1α/SLUG <0.001a
(4) Both HIF-1α/SLUG low expression 27 (84.4) 5 (15.6)
(5) One of HIF-1α/SLUG high expression 22 (46.8) 25 (53.2) 0.019b
(6) Both HIF-1α/SLUG high expression 12 (24.0) 38 (76.0)
HIF-1α/MT/SLUG
Not all of HIF-1α/MT/SLUG high expression 60 (62.5) 36 (37.5) <0.001c
All of HIF-1α/MT/SLUG high expression 1 (3.0) 32 (97.0)

Correlation of concomitant expression of HIF-1α, MT and SLUG with LNM was measured by Chi-square test;

a

stands for significant difference among the three groups;

b

stands for significant difference between group (2) and group (3);

c

stands for significant difference between groups with and without concomitant expression of all three molecules.